Summary:
Pawtucket, Rhode Island, has 16 schools serving elementary, middle and high school grades: 10 elementary schools, three middle schools and three high schools. Results vary substantially from school to school, and the strongest local results do not mean most students are near statewide proficiency levels. In 2025–26, elementary-school averages were 21.1% in ELA, 25.1% in math and 20.9% in science, compared with state results of 33.1%, 31.9% and 31.1%; middle-school averages were lower still. The most important takeaway is that families should compare schools by level and subject: the area has clear standouts, but its elementary and middle schools generally trail the state.
Francis J. Varieur School led elementary schools in all three subjects, with 39.6% in ELA, 37.3% in math and 35.5% in science; Elizabeth Baldwin School was lowest, at 9.5%, 7.5% and 6.0%. That is a 30.1-point ELA gap between the two schools. Among middle schools, Lyman B. Goff Middle School led in ELA, math and science, while Samuel Slater Middle School ranked lowest in all three; even Goff’s best subject result, 20.3% in ELA, was below the state figure. Jacqueline M. Walsh School led the high schools in reported SAT results, including 70.5% in 11th-grade ELA, versus 11.4% at Charles E. Shea High School—a 59.1-point difference. Walsh’s graduation rate was 100%, compared with 81.4% at Shea and 69.9% at William E. Tolman High.
Recent changes are mixed rather than consistently upward: average elementary science results rose 1.6 points from 2024–25, while ELA fell 2.0 points and math fell 2.3; middle-school averages declined in all three subjects. Individual exceptions include science gains of 23.3 points at Varieur and 19.6 at Nathanael Greene School. SchoolDigger’s rankings also moved in different directions: Walsh’s statewide percentile rose from 64 to 74 between 2023–24 and 2025–26, while Tolman’s fell from 23 to 17. School characteristics alone do not predict results: Varieur and Baldwin have similar enrollment and student–teacher ratios (11.7 and 11.8), yet very different scores; their free/reduced-lunch rates are 78.52% and 85.31%, respectively. These figures provide context, not an explanation for the differences.
Thank you for your feedback!