Summary
Thomas R Rodman is a K–5 elementary school at 497 Mill Street in New Bedford, Massachusetts, serving about 200 students — one of the smaller elementary buildings in its immediate area — and it currently ranks 884th of 899 ranked Massachusetts elementary schools, the 2nd percentile, with 0 stars. That is the endpoint of a long slide: the school sat at the 69th percentile in 2018–19, then fell to 41st, 29th, 24th, 21st, 9th and finally 2nd — a 67-percentile-point drop over seven years. Its district, New Bedford, ranks 327th of 351 Massachusetts districts.
Academics are far below both district and state averages. In 2025–26, MCAS all-grades proficiency was 11.71% in ELA, 3.60% in math and 7.89% in science, compared with district averages of 19.81 / 19.26 / 16.05 and state averages of 40.03 / 41.11 / 40.98. All three subjects have declined every year, with the sharpest drops in 2025–26. Mathematics is the acute weakness: at 3.60%, it is the lowest of every school in this comparison set, and the gap shows at every grade — 3rd grade 2.56%, 4th grade 5.88%, 5th grade 2.63%. Resources do not appear to be the constraint: Rodman spent $19,467 per student in 2020–21, the highest among eleven nearby schools, with a student–teacher ratio of 11.0.
The most useful comparisons sit within walking distance. Elizabeth Carter Brooks, 0.54 miles away with 261 students in the same district, posted 41.79% ELA and 38.06% math — a 30-point ELA gap. James B Congdon, 1.34 miles away, reached 52.24% math and 57.14% science, above state averages. James M. Quinn School in Dartmouth, 0.86 miles away, approaches state results while spending about $4,800 less per student. Note that Rodman's cohorts are small, so single-year grade and subgroup results swing widely; read trends across multiple years. Free/reduced-lunch percentages are suppressed, and spending data stops at 2020–21.
Thank you for your feedback!