Summary
Rindge Avenue Upper School is a 292-student, grades 6–8 Cambridge Public Schools middle school at 70 Rindge Avenue in Cambridge, MA, and in 2025–2026 it is a 4-star school ranked 54th of 478 Massachusetts middle schools. That puts it in the 89th percentile, or the top 11% of middle schools statewide—up from the 69th percentile in 2015–2016 and the 71st percentile in 2018–2019. The Cambridge district itself is ranked 71st of 351 districts, at the 80th percentile with 4 stars.
In 2025–2026, the school’s MCAS Next Generation proficiency rates were 72.24% in English language arts, 69.85% in mathematics, 51.72% in science, and 55.81% in civics. Those results are about 12–13 points above the Cambridge district in ELA and math and 29–32 points above the Massachusetts average; science is only 0.69 points above the district, and civics is 4.49 points above it. Mathematics has improved sharply, from 54.44% in 2022–2023 to 69.85% in 2025–2026, while ELA has risen modestly. Science rose to 63.53% in 2024–2025 before falling to 51.72% in 2025–2026, and civics fell from 63.33% to 55.81%, so those two subjects are the main academic questions to watch.
Among Cambridge upper schools, it is the highest-ranked: Putnam Avenue Upper School is 87th (82nd percentile), Darby Vassall Upper School is 111th (77th), and Cambridge Street Upper School is 139th (71st). It leads those schools in ELA, math, and civics, though that peer edges it in science. Its student-to-teacher ratio of 9.4 is higher than its district peers’ 7.0–8.9, yet it still produces the strongest overall results. Compared with nearby suburban schools, it is close to Belmont Middle School in ELA but lower in math, science, and civics; Ottoson Middle and that Belmont school are 5-star schools at the 98th–99th percentile. The school spends about $32,434 per student, far more than those comparison schools, so spending alone does not explain the results. The school’s effectiveness rankings are strong for several student groups, including special education students at the 89th percentile, but the low-income group’s ranking has slipped from 82nd to 70th over three years—a gap worth asking about.
Thank you for your feedback!