Summary
Beeman Memorial is a K–5 elementary school at 138 Cherry Street in Gloucester, MA, with 292 students, part of the Gloucester district. The district is ranked 259th of 351 Massachusetts districts (26th percentile, 1 star), and Beeman Memorial itself ranked 685th of 899 schools in 2025–2026 (24th percentile, 1 star). The school’s rank history shows a long-term decline: in 2015–2016 it was near the state median (50th percentile, 3 stars), but since 2021–2022 it has mostly sat in the bottom quartile. The latest year is a slight improvement over the prior year but still bottom-quartile and 1-star.
In 2025–2026 MCAS Next Generation proficiency, Beeman Memorial scored 30.07% in ELA, 22.08% in math, and 31.37% in science. The Gloucester district scored 34.05%, 29.19%, and 34.87%; the state scored 40.03%, 41.11%, and 40.98%. Beeman Memorial is below both district and state in all three subjects, with math the weakest. Among Gloucester elementary schools, Beeman Memorial is the lowest-ranked overall. Plum Cove School is the clear standout (57th percentile, 3 stars, 45.45% ELA, 42.42% math), while East Veterans Elementary School and West Parish also outperform Beeman Memorial in math. Math weakness concentrates in 5th grade (15.69%, vs. 28.64% district and 39.5% state), and 4th grade ELA is also weak (25.45%). Regionally, Beeman Memorial is far below nearby schools such as Manchester Memorial Elementary (69.57% ELA, 63.83% math), Cutler School (61.21% ELA, 69.23% math), and even Rockport Elementary, a 2-star district school, which outperforms Beeman Memorial in ELA (39.68% vs. 30.07%) and math (40.94% vs. 22.08%).
Resources do not appear to explain the gap: Beeman Memorial’s student-teacher ratio is 9.5, lower than Plum Cove School (12.9), East Veterans Elementary School (11.2), and West Parish (13.1). Per-student spending was $19,973 in 2020–2021, similar to West Parish. Yet outcomes are lower. A bright spot is special education: the school’s effectiveness rank for special education students is 79th percentile (4 stars) in 2025–2026, far above its overall 24th percentile and a sharp jump from prior years. Low-income students and other groups still rank low, suggesting broad-based challenges. If the school targets one area, upper-elementary math appears most urgent; science is volatile rather than consistently strong.
Thank you for your feedback!