Summary
Lander Elementary is a K–6 school in the Mayfield City School District in Cleveland, OH, serving 506 students at 1714 Lander Rd. The district is strong overall—104th of 773 Ohio districts, 87th percentile, 4 stars—but Lander’s own 2025–26 rank is 639th of 1,560 elementary schools, 59th percentile, 3 stars. Its recent history is up and down: 72nd percentile in 2024–25, 70th in 2023–24, 64th in 2022–23, 42nd in 2021–22, and 72nd in 2018–19. Chronic absenteeism improved to 15.0% in 2025–26 from 22.6% in 2024–25, now below the district’s 16.7%. About 49.41% of students received free/reduced lunch in 2024–25, and the student-teacher ratio was 18.0 in 2024–25.
Academically, Lander generally beats the state but trails its district. In 2025–26, it was above state proficiency in science 5, math 3, math 4, math 5, ELA 3, and ELA 4. ELA 3 is a standout at 85.5%, only 1.6 points below the district and far above the state’s 63.4%. But ELA 5 is weaker: 64.2%, below both the district (77.2%) and state (70.4%). Against district peers, Lander trails Gates Mills Elementary School, Millridge Elementary School, and Mayfield Center Elementary School in most grades. Compared with nearby non-Mayfield schools, Lander is stronger than Richmond Heights Elementary School, Gearity Professional Development School, and Rowland Elementary School in several areas, while Hilltop Elementary School in Beachwood City is mixed—higher in ELA 5 and math 5, lower in ELA 3 and ELA 4.
Subgroup results are uneven. Gifted and talented students rank 3/90, 97th percentile, 5 stars—exceptionally strong. But special education students rank 687/914, 25th percentile, 1 star, and low-SES students rank 768/1,467, 48th percentile, 2 stars. Lander has the highest free/reduced lunch rate among the Mayfield schools shown (49.41% vs. 27.99–35.83%), a higher student-teacher ratio than Gates Mills and Mayfield Center, and lower per-student spending than those two. That context helps explain differences, but the main watch items are 5th-grade ELA, special education effectiveness, low-SES outcomes, and sustaining the attendance improvement. Because performance has been volatile, single-year results should be read with caution.
Thank you for your feedback!