Summary
Lloyd High School serves 711 students in grades 9–12 in Erlanger, a Northern Kentucky community, and is part of the Erlanger-Elsmere Independent district. Its latest results show a mixed picture: reading is a clear strength, while several tested subjects lag behind nearby schools. The most pressing concern is that math, social studies, and editing and mechanics results are substantially below nearby traditional high-school averages.
Reading stands out: 55% of students were proficient, 6 percentage points above the state and 4 above the district; the result was 3 points below the nearby-school average. Writing was also above the state by 2 points and matched the district. In contrast, math proficiency was 39%, just below the state but 15 points below the nearby-school average. Social studies and editing and mechanics were each about 15 points below nearby averages; both were also below the state, by 8 and 9 points, respectively. Graduation is a positive indicator: 96% graduated, above the state and district rates, though below the nearby traditional high schools with reported results. Chronic absenteeism remains a concern at 27%, compared with 24% statewide and 19% districtwide.
Reading has improved markedly, rising from 35% in 2023–2024 to 55% in 2025–2026 and moving from 11 points below the state to 6 points above it. Math also gained 11 points over those years, though the latest result remains weak relative to nearby schools. SchoolDigger’s statewide percentile rose from 22 to 43 and its rating from 1 star to 2 stars, but its latest percentile was second-lowest among the six nearby traditional high schools compared. In 2024–2025, 87% of students were free/reduced lunch eligible; the nearby-school average was 35%. The student-teacher ratio was 19.7, close to the nearby-school average of 19.0. SchoolDigger’s subgroup rankings show notably stronger measured standing for African American students, at the 88th percentile compared with 43rd overall, and lower standing for female students, at the 26th percentile. These subgroup rankings may be based on small group counts.
Thank you for your feedback!