Summary:
The Lauderdale County school district in Alabama serves seven elementary schools (grades PK-6) with a total enrollment of roughly 4,274 students, and the district as a whole ranks in the 60th percentile statewide with a 3-star rating.
For parents, the standout choice is Lexington Elementary School, which ranks 144th in Alabama (4 stars) and is the district's most consistent high performer, with exceptional 3rd grade scores (82.69% proficient in Math, 84.62% in English) and the second-lowest poverty rate. Brooks Elementary School is also a strong option, with the lowest chronic absenteeism (17.5%) and the lowest free/reduced lunch rate (32.84%). The most dramatic improvement story is Wilson Elementary School, which jumped 195 spots in state rankings over two years, driven by a 23.5-point gain in 4th grade Science. On the other end, Rogers Elementary School is the district's biggest concern: it has the lowest ranking (389th), the highest chronic absenteeism (24.7%), the highest student-teacher ratio (19.7), and the weakest 5th grade Math (23.53% proficiency). Lauderdale Elementary School also struggles with attendance (24.3% chronic absenteeism), while Central Elementary School and Underwood Elementary School sit in the middle of the pack.
District-wide, Lauderdale County outperforms Alabama state averages in nearly every subject and grade level, with the biggest advantage in 3rd grade Math (+10.3 points) and English (+5.7 points). However, that edge narrows significantly by 5th grade, and chronic absenteeism is a district-wide red flag—every school exceeds the state average of 12%, with the best school (Brooks) still at 17.5%. Interestingly, poverty rates do not predict performance: Wilson has the highest free/reduced lunch rate (49.82%) yet outperforms Rogers, which has a similar rate. English proficiency is a clear strength across all schools, with 5th grade averaging 73.07%. Parents should also note that math scores can swing dramatically year-to-year (e.g., Lauderdale's 4th grade Math jumped 31 points), likely due to small class sizes, so single-year data should be viewed with caution.
Thank you for your feedback!