Summary
Underwood Elementary is a PK–5 school in the Wauwatosa School District in Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, serving 315 students. The district ranks in the 67th percentile statewide, but Underwood ranks 698th of 1,039 in 2025–2026 (33rd percentile, 2 stars), down from the 78th percentile in 2015–2016. Free/reduced lunch participation rose to 41.59% in 2024–2025, and chronic absenteeism was 13.5%, above the district’s 12.6% but improved from 21.1% in 2021–2022. Per-student spending is $17,223, and the student-teacher ratio is 10.8.
Compared with other Wauwatosa elementary schools, Underwood trails most same-district peers. In 2025–2026, Lincoln ranked 95th percentile, Wauwatosa STEM 91st, Wauwatosa Montessori School 87th, McKinley 86th, Wilson 67th, Underwood 33rd, and Eisenhower 28th. Third grade is a bright spot: ELA proficiency was 69.23% and math 61.54%, above or tied with district and above state. Upper grades are weaker: 4th grade ELA 35.85%, 5th grade ELA 44.9%, 4th grade math 39.62%, 5th grade math 36.73%, and 4th grade science 39.62%, all below district and state. Third-grade ELA improved from 35.56% to 69.23% over three years, and math from 28.89% to 61.54%.
Underwood has the highest free/reduced lunch rate among Wauwatosa peers: 41.59%, versus 10–34% for others. That is lower than nearby West Allis-West Milwaukee School District schools—Irving 59.47%, Wilson 65.75%, and Walker 56.06%—and much higher than Tonawanda in the Elmbrook School District at 7.32%. Chronic absenteeism is above most Wauwatosa peers but similar to West Allis schools. Despite spending more per student ($17,223) and a lower student-teacher ratio (10.8) than most peers, outcomes lag. Low-income students rank in the 16th percentile (1 star), and special education students rank in the 38th percentile (2 stars). Walker, with higher poverty, has better 5th grade ELA (61.54% vs. 44.9%) and math (59.62% vs. 36.73%). Underwood faces high poverty relative to its district, absenteeism above district norms, weak upper-grade achievement, and low effectiveness for low-income and special education students; strengths include strong 3rd grade, improved absenteeism, and favorable staffing and spending.
Thank you for your feedback!