Summary
Lake Superior Elementary is a PK–5 public school with 603 students in Ashland, Wisconsin, the largest elementary in its local comparison group and part of Ashland School District. Its state ranking has sat in the bottom quarter for years: 812th of 1,039 (22nd percentile, 1 star) in 2025–26, 22nd percentile in 2024–25, and 19th percentile in the two years before. About 57% of students qualified for free or reduced-price lunch in 2024–25.
Chronic absenteeism is a bright spot: it fell from 30.1% in 2021–22 to 17.4% in 2024–25, matching the state average (17.3%) and sitting well below the district's 28.3%. Comparisons with nearby schools are revealing. Marengo Valley Elementary, in the same district, serves a higher-poverty population (67.93% free or reduced-price lunch), spends less per student ($15,450), and has larger classes (14.8 students per teacher), yet ranks 72nd percentile with 4 stars and only 9.6% chronic absenteeism. Washburn Elementary, with lower poverty (37.54%), ranks 3 stars and 53rd percentile. Bayfield Elementary ranks 8th percentile with 0 stars despite spending $31,364 per student; Lake outperforms it. La Pointe Elementary, with 11 students, is not directly comparable.
Test scores are the clearest challenge. In 2025–26, Lake Superior scored below both the district and the state in every reported grade and subject. Fourth-grade math proficiency was 24.44%, versus 33.33% district and 52.87% state, down from 30.23% a year earlier. Fourth-grade science (34.44%) and social studies (43.33%) trail the state by roughly 19 to 22 points, and English language arts is below state in every grade, though 5th grade ELA (44.83%) is close to the district (46.67%). Some grades have improved since 2022–23 (3rd grade ELA rose from 26.67% to 44.32%), but declines in 4th grade math, science, and social studies show progress isn't yet consistent. Special education students (33rd percentile) and low-income students (24th percentile) have improved but remain below average, and the low overall rating is broad-based rather than tied to one group. Because a higher-poverty, lower-spending school nearby gets far better results, school-level practices seem worth examining.
Thank you for your feedback!