Summary
John Marshall School of Engineering is a public high school serving grades 9–12 with 459 students in the Cleveland Municipal district on Cleveland’s west side, at 3952 W 140th St.
For 2025–26, the school is ranked 699 out of 795 Ohio high schools, a 1-star rating in the 12th percentile. Its graduation rate is 70.1%, below the district’s 79.6%, and chronic absenteeism is 72.4%, far above the district’s 54.3%. Test-score strengths are American Government (63.8%), American History (52.0%), and Biology (39.4%), where it exceeds district averages, but English II (27.9%), Geometry (9.7%), and Algebra I (24.5%) are below district and all subjects remain far below state averages. Government improved from 49.4%, while History, Biology, English II, and Geometry declined; Geometry fell from 21.6% to 9.7%. The student–teacher ratio rose to 21.8, and per-student spending was $13,319 in 2018–19. Overall, the school’s percentile fell to 12th from 22nd in both 2023–24 and 2024–25.
Nearby comparisons show wide gaps. Bard Early College Cleveland, 0.67 miles away in the same district, is ranked 283 of 795 with a 97.5% graduation rate, 45.6% chronic absenteeism, and test scores from 62.4% to 87.4%. Fairview High School (ranked 214, 91.3% graduation, 20.3% absenteeism), Lakewood High School (ranked 317, 98.2% graduation, 37.5% absenteeism), and Brooklyn High School (ranked 391, 96.8% graduation, 34.8% absenteeism) also outperform it. New Technology West outperforms it in all six 2025–26 subjects. At the same address, John Marshall School of Information Technology and John Marshall School of Business and Civic Leadership have different strengths; this school leads in Government and Biology but trails in several other subjects. The School of One has a lower rank but higher English II, while Lake Erie International High School has much lower graduation and higher absenteeism. For parents, the key concerns are attendance, graduation, and math/English instruction, while social studies and biology are relative strengths; English language learners and some other groups perform comparatively better, though subgroup results have declined.
Thank you for your feedback!