Summary
Dayton Intermediate School in Dayton, Nevada, is a grades 7–8 school serving 356 students in the Lyon County School District, a high-poverty area where 100% of students were eligible for free or reduced lunch in 2024–2025. In 2025–2026, it ranked 114th of 148 Nevada middle schools—23rd percentile, 1 star—while the district ranked 10th of 12. Proficiency rates were 20% in math, 27.8% in reading, and 17.3% in science, all below Nevada averages. Chronic absenteeism was 26.8%, and per-student spending was $14,141 in 2023–2024, with a student-teacher ratio of 21.5.
The school's long-term trend is concerning: it fell from 42nd of 122 (66th percentile, 3 stars) in 2015–2016 to 114th of 148 (23rd percentile, 1 star) in 2025–2026. Compared with nearby schools, it outperforms Silver Stage Middle School and Edward L. Pine Middle School in all three subjects, and is about even with Eagle Valley Middle School in math but lower in reading and science. It trails Carson Middle School, which also serves 100% FRL students but scores 29.4% math, 40.4% reading, 32.4% science, and has a lower student-teacher ratio. It also trails Virginia City Middle School, Incline Middle School, Kendyl Depoali Middle School, and Marce Herz Middle School by wide margins. These comparisons matter because some nearby schools serve much lower-poverty populations.
Attendance is a relative bright spot: 26.8% chronic absenteeism is below the Lyon district rate of 36.6% and close to the Nevada rate of 25.5%; it is better than Silver Stage Middle School, Edward L. Pine Middle School, Carson Middle School, and Virginia City Middle School, and roughly equal to Eagle Valley Middle School. Science is above the Lyon district average (17.3% vs. 13.8%) but below the state average (25.5%). Within grades, 7th grade math and 8th grade reading are relative bright spots against district averages, while 8th grade math and science are clear weaknesses. Despite per-student spending rising from $9,764 in 2020–2021 to $14,141 in 2023–2024, proficiency has not improved. Historical subgroup data from 2017–2018 showed gaps for special education students and English learners, but current subgroup results were not provided.
Thank you for your feedback!