Summary
Swansboro High is a comprehensive public high school serving about 1,232 students in grades 9–12 in Swansboro, NC, and belongs to Onslow County Schools, which itself has a mid-tier 2-star district rating. Despite that, Swansboro consistently earns a 4-star rating, ranking 172nd out of 662 North Carolina high schools in 2025–2026 and landing in the 74th percentile. Among the traditional high schools in Onslow County, it is the clear standout: Jacksonville High ranks in the 52nd percentile, Northside High in the 37th, White Oak High in the 32nd, and Southwest High in the 14th. Only the selective Onslow Early College outranks it within the district.
Academically, Swansboro exceeds district and state averages in every End-of-Course subject, with particularly strong math results—Math I proficiency of 68.6% versus 44.5% for the district and 42.1% for the state in 2025–2026. The graduation rate has also been above the state average for four straight years, reaching 92.5% most recently. The school shines for several student groups: special education students rank in the 93rd percentile, military-connected students in the 83rd, and multiracial students in the 93rd. Hispanic students have also remained consistently strong. One area of concern is a sharp drop in the African American subgroup ranking over the past three years, which is worth monitoring closely, but this is not connected to any overall trend at the school.
Chronic absenteeism has improved steadily from 35.4% to 23.0%, matching the state average, though nearby Croatan High in Carteret County Public Schools sits lower at 17.6%. Croatan also posts higher proficiency rates in every subject, making it a meaningful aspirational benchmark for Swansboro despite having less economic disadvantage. Swansboro does its work efficiently, spending about $9,312 per student while outproducing schools with higher spending in the same district. With a strong 2025–2026 rebound in all subjects, Swansboro is well positioned to keep improving as it continues addressing attendance and internal subgroup gaps.
Thank you for your feedback!