Beta You're viewing our redesigned school page. Prefer the classic layout?

Nova Classical Academy Lower School

Public, Charter Grades K-5
86th
SchoolDigger Rank ?
of 869 Minnesota Elementary Schools
Better than 90% of Minnesota elementary schools
Summary

Nova Classical Academy Lower School is a K–5 elementary school with 485 students in Saint Paul, Minnesota, part of the Nova Classical Academy district, which ranks 8th of 458 districts statewide. The school itself ranks 86th of 869 Minnesota elementary schools in 2025–2026 — the 90th percentile, or 5 stars — placing it in the top 10% statewide.

Nova's proficiency rates are roughly double those of most nearby schools, nearly all of which are in Saint Paul Public Schools. In 2025–2026, Nova scored 72.0% in math, 67.8% in reading, and 36.3% in science, versus state rates of 44.9%, 48.6%, and 25.5%. Nearby Cherokee Heights Elementary School posted 16.8% in math and 20.8% in reading, Highland Park Elementary 20.1% and 24.0%, and Adams Magnet Elementary 47.9% and 46.4%. Only two nearby schools match Nova's profile: Randolph Heights Elementary (72.8% math, 68.7% reading) and Somerset Elementary (77.7% math, 68.4% reading). All three serve similar student bodies — Nova's free/reduced lunch rate is 23.51%, close to Randolph's 25.89% and Somerset's 24.76%, but far below Cherokee Heights (71.93%) and Urban Academy (98.8%). Its student-teacher ratio is 13.8.

Two trends are worth watching. Nova has slipped from 20th of 858 (98th percentile) in 2021–2022 to 86th of 869 in 2025–2026, despite keeping 5 stars, and science proficiency has dropped sharply from 73.42% to 36.3% since 2022–2023. Math stays strong across grades, and 5th-grade reading (77.8%) outpaces Randolph Heights Elementary' 64.6%. Subgroup effectiveness rankings, which compare how well the school serves specific student groups, are mostly at or above the 82nd percentile, including 92nd for low-income students.

485
Students ?
13.8
Student/teacher ratio ?
$11,508
Per pupil spending ?
23.5%
Free/reduced lunch eligible (2024-25) ?
All students in Minnesota receive free school meals.
80%
Kindergartners vaccinated against measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) (2025-26)
Exemptions: 0% (MMR)
 1455 Victoria Way
       Saint Paul, MN  55102-8888

(651) 209-6320

District: Nova Classical Academy

Racial breakdown:

White:
55.1%
African American:
17.1%
Asian:
12.8%
more
 See top rated Minnesota elementary schools

 Compare Nova Classical Academy Lower School to nearby elementary schools!
At a glance
▼ Ranking trend: Declining — 96th percentile in 2016 → 90th in 2026
Strengths
✓Test scores above the Minnesota average (65% vs 43% meeting standards)
✓Ranks in the top 10% of Minnesota elementary schools
Worth a look
!Ranking has slipped — down 6 percentile points since 2016
!Some student groups rank well below the school's overall statewide standing
Students meeting standards (2025-2026) ?
This school65%
District avg67%
Minnesota avg43%
86th of 869
Minnesota public elementary schools ?
Top 10%▼ down 5 pts since 2016
From top 4% (2016) to top 10% (2026)
See the entire ranking list of Minnesota Elementary Schools →
★★★★★
SchoolDigger rating ?
8th of 458Nova Classical Academy among Minnesota districts
Statewide rank percentile over time (100 = the top-ranked school in the state; click a legend item to add a student group)
Show full rank history (all student groups)

All Students

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202685.986 of 86990.1%★★★★★
202586.679 of 87290.9%★★★★★
202487.964 of 88192.7%★★★★★
202390.535 of 84595.9%★★★★★
202291.520 of 85897.7%★★★★★
202186.670 of 86991.9%★★★★★
201991.120 of 87097.7%★★★★★
201881.6106 of 84787.5%★★★★☆
201785.852 of 85393.9%★★★★★
201687.538 of 84895.5%★★★★★
201583.378 of 84090.7%★★★★★
201482.181 of 82690.2%★★★★★
201383.664 of 82492.2%★★★★★
201275.2152 of 82081.5%★★★★☆
201177.9115 of 81485.9%★★★★☆
201080.269 of 80391.4%★★★★★
200888.513 of 78198.3%★★★★★
200787.819 of 77797.6%★★★★★
200689.89 of 75698.8%★★★★★
200590.83 of 68599.6%★★★★★
200486.328 of 67695.9%★★★★★

African American

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202673.955 of 31582.5%★★★★☆
202588.917 of 29894.3%★★★★★
202477.751 of 31083.5%★★★★☆

Asian

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202659.754 of 14362.2%★★★☆☆
202452.172 of 15453.2%★★★☆☆
202351.761 of 12852.3%★★★☆☆
202272.539 of 13170.2%★★★★☆

Female

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202677.7139 of 79082.4%★★★★☆
202580.9119 of 79985.1%★★★★☆
202478.5135 of 80983.3%★★★★☆
202390.128 of 78796.4%★★★★★
202290.717 of 79997.9%★★★★★
202186.648 of 78393.9%★★★★★
201988.323 of 78797.1%★★★★★
201883.975 of 77490.3%★★★★★

Low Socio Economic Status

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202683.061 of 76492.0%★★★★★
202591.521 of 76497.3%★★★★★
202459.2310 of 79360.9%★★★☆☆
202366.4232 of 77470.0%★★★★☆
201989.921 of 74097.2%★★★★★
201869.0192 of 72873.6%★★★★☆

Male

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202688.343 of 80794.7%★★★★★
202585.073 of 81291.0%★★★★★
202491.520 of 82697.6%★★★★★
202386.654 of 79993.2%★★★★★
202288.339 of 80895.2%★★★★★
202182.292 of 78488.3%★★★★☆
201990.219 of 79897.6%★★★★★
201873.2196 of 77974.8%★★★★☆

Special Education

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202671.098 of 57983.1%★★★★☆
202475.197 of 57283.0%★★★★☆
202297.22 of 50099.6%★★★★★

White

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202687.843 of 71093.9%★★★★★
202589.534 of 71495.2%★★★★★
202489.328 of 73096.2%★★★★★
202391.316 of 71297.8%★★★★★
202293.19 of 72598.8%★★★★★
202187.435 of 71095.1%★★★★★
201988.121 of 72297.1%★★★★★
201875.9118 of 71283.4%★★★★☆
How student groups rank statewide ? (each group's percentile vs the same group at other schools — higher is better; the +/- beside each compares the group with this school's overall percentile)
Male (2026)95th percentile+5 vs school
White (2026)94th percentile+4 vs school
Low Socio Economic Status (2026)92nd percentile~ school
Special Education (2026)83rd percentile-7 vs school
African American (2026)83rd percentile-8 vs school
Female (2026)82nd percentile-8 vs school
Asian (2026)62nd percentile-28 vs school
By subject vs Minnesota (2025-2026) ?
Math72%+27 vs state
Reading68%+19 vs state
Science36%+11 vs state

2.9
12 ratings · 9 written reviews
5★5
4★1
3★0
2★0
1★6
Rate Nova Classical Academy Lower School
Have first-hand experience? A quick rating - and a sentence or two about what stands out (teachers, academics, safety, communication) - helps other families know what to expect.
Takes about a minute. We email you a link to verify your review - your address is never shown publicly.
Tap a star to rate
What people are saying
by a student
Tuesday, October 24, 2017

Open Quote I was there for one year. I had teachers who threw pens, pencils, and even highlighters at students, mocked and humiliated them, and expressed to the point of outright stating they had favorites, and who those favorites were. Close Quote


by a parent
Sunday, April 17, 2016

Open Quote As a parent of several NOVA students for over 10 years, I caution parents considering sending their children to NOVA. We are leaving NOVA at the conclusion of this academic year. A large problem is that NOVA built a new school facility. Because of increased operating costs NOVA was forced to increase the number of students entering NOVA & to accept lateral transfers in the upper school. High performing classical schools do not accept lateral transfers in upper grades due to the difficulty in getting those students to do well in classes such as Latin. There is a small but growing group of liberal parents among these newer families who seek out NOVA only because of our high test scores. These parents are not interested in classical education but are well versed in catch phrases, wearing buttons and t-shirts instead of logically discussing issues. The high test scores are the direct result of parent involvement & the parents being the primary educators. NOVA was built on direct parental involvement. The board of directors this year just removed direct parent involvement in selecting curriculum materials and placed this power in the hands of a few board members who are social justice warriors. Several families that were at NOVA from the start have now left or preparing to leave at great emotional and financial cost. NOVA has replaced their original reading program for a less rigorous one, removed Singapore Math from the upper school, and removed the instruction of logic from the school of logic (6-8 grade). Logical? No, but necessary as NOVA moves further and further away from classical education. The dumbing down of NOVA has begun and a true classical education is being replaced by social justice. The most vocal parents have enlisted the help of outside community organizations who advocate for gender neutral bathrooms allowing boys and girls to share bathrooms and locker rooms starting in kindergarten through 12th grade. Like most ordinary public schools, the values of parents take a back seat to organized movements advocating social change by targeting our youth. Close Quote


by a parent
Wednesday, March 9, 2016

Open Quote We have been a part of the community at Nova for many years now and have been pleased with the experience. A true model of the Classical teaching method, Nova has not only imparted academic subject matter but also a love of learning and greater sense of the world,its history, and our responsibility to its citizenry. We are grateful for our time here thus far and look forward to experiencing all the greatness that is yet to come, for ourselves and the Nova learning community. Close Quote


by a parent
Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Open Quote This was a GREAT school, with a leaning toward classical education. Many dedicated exceptional teachers. Parent lead, and a community that compromised. In the previous 3 years the compromising has ceased, and a new administration and board have removed parent participation, chosen a less quality curriculum to make it easier on staff , and have embraced an agenda that will seriously damage performance and quality of a recently stellar public school. Very sad to see such a good school go down. Close Quote


by a parent
Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Open Quote I couldn't be happier at Nova! Caring teachers who attend to the learning needs of my special needs child. Love it!! Close Quote


by a teacher
Saturday, December 3, 2011

Open Quote The negative reviews of Nova below are exaggerated and, at times, factually inacurate. Nova educates EACH child according to his/her abiltiies. I hope that as parents read such reviews, they consider that there are multiple sides to each and every story, and that doing one's research is paramount to selecting a good school and working in a partnership between any school and family. Close Quote


by a parent
Saturday, April 23, 2011

Open Quote Our child was failing for almost a year. NOVA kept assuring us everything would be fine. A law known as Child Find states that schools have an obligation to take appropriate assessment steps when a child is suspected of having a disability. NOVA did not take these steps. NOVA finally agreed to evaluate our son, and stated that he did not have a disability. We were also informed that he would be held back the following year. We enrolled him in another school and found out that he has ADHD, Dyslexia and a Speech Language Impairment. Can you imagine propping up your test scores on the backs of disabled children? Close Quote


by a parent
Thursday, April 7, 2011

Open Quote NOVA is a one trick pony. They take above average students and produce above average test scores. This is not much of an accomplishment. In contrast, consider a local public school, Somerset Elementary. The percentages of challenging students enrolled at Somerset (English as a Second Language, Special Education, Free and Reduced Lunch) are 200 to 300 percent higher, and Somerset still matches or beats NOVA's MCA scores. Now that's impressive!
If your child is above average, he/she will probably be okay at NOVA. If your child is average or below average; your child will probably struggle, and be ignored until you remove him / her from the school. If you don't remove your child, your child will most likely be held back. You will be told that grade retention is usually a successful intervention. However, this directly contradicts the vast majority of research done over the past century. Finally, the systemic neglect of Special Education students at NOVA is deplorable. Close Quote


by a parent
Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Open Quote Amazing school. A private school education for free! Great teachers, smart curriculum, great organization, character education, and so much more. I'm thankful every day that my child got in to Nova. Close Quote





Schools Near Nova Classical Academy Lower School

Ranking:
Map legend
E Elementary M Middle H High A Alternative P Private






Frequently Asked Questions about Nova Classical Academy Lower School

Students at Nova Classical Academy Lower School are 55% White, 17% African American, 13% Asian, 8% Hispanic, 7% Two or more races.

In the 2024-25 school year, 485 students attended Nova Classical Academy Lower School.

Yes. Nova Classical Academy Lower School ranks in the top 9.9% of Minnesota elementary schools.

Rate Nova Classical Academy Lower School!



Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Nova Classical Academy Lower School!


Latest Minnesota data All new data »
2019–20 through 2025–26 immunization rates (updated)Oct 19, 2026
2024–25 through 2025–26 MCA-III & MCA-IV test scoresSep 30, 2026
2024–25 dropout rates & graduation ratesJun 13, 2026
2024–25 MCA-III test scoresAug 29, 2025


SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the Minnesota Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.

Diagnostics