Summary
Birch Meadow is a K–5 elementary school in Reading, MA, serving 359 students in a high-performing suburban district north of Boston. In 2025–2026 it ranked 239th of 899 Massachusetts elementary schools — the 73rd percentile, with 4 stars — while the Reading district ranked 43rd of 351 (88th percentile, 4 stars). Birch Meadow's all-grade proficiency was 53.55% in ELA, 53.55% in math, and 55.74% in science: above state averages (about 40–41%) but below district averages (61.27% ELA, 64.46% math, 65.67% science).
Compared with nearby schools, Birch Meadow lands in the middle-to-lower tier. Within Reading, Joshua Eaton (16th), Alice M. Barrows (120th), J. Warren Killam (150th), and Wood End (152nd) all rank higher, and Birch Meadow has the lowest 2025–2026 ELA, math, and science proficiency among them. Its math is 19.18 points below Wood End and science 15.23 points below. Outside the district, L. D. Batchelder (North Reading, 14th) and Walton (Wakefield, 50th) rank far higher, E. Ethel Little (North Reading, 123rd) is ahead, Woburn Street (Wilmington, 152nd) and Dolbeare (Wakefield, 262nd) are broadly comparable, and Mary D. Altavesta (Woburn, 599th) ranks much lower.
Results vary by grade: 4th grade is a relative bright spot, within roughly 3–4 points of district averages, while 3rd grade math (-18.64), 5th grade math (-16.72), and 5th grade science (-13.35) show the biggest district-relative gaps. Science is the most striking change — above district in 2023–2024 and 2024–2025, then below it in 2025–2026 — and the math gap widened from -4.28 to -10.91 points. A clear strength is effectiveness for special education students, ranked in the 80th–88th percentile in recent years. The student-teacher ratio (10.7) and per-student spending ($17,870) are favorable within Reading, yet outcomes trail peers, suggesting resources alone are not driving results. Free/reduced-lunch data were not reported, spending is from 2020–2021, and ratios are from 2024–2025, so comparisons are directional.
Thank you for your feedback!