Summary
David Prouty High is a grades 9–12 school in Spencer, MA, serving about 306 students in the Spencer-E Brookfield district. The district ranks 279th of 351 in Massachusetts (21st percentile, 1 star), but David Prouty High ranked 205th of 353 in 2025–2026 (42nd percentile, 2 stars), so the school is outperforming its district's overall standing. Its rank improved from the 20th percentile in 2022–2023 to the 36th–42nd percentile recently, though it remains below the state median.
Academically, 10th grade English Language Arts is a clear strength, while science and biology are weak and math is below the state average. In 2025–2026, ELA proficiency was 59.62%, above the state's 45.48% and district's 54.24%, and close to Wachusett Regional High (58.37%) and Bay Path Regional Vocational Technical High School (60.70%). It was well above Auburn Senior High, Leicester High, Doherty Memorial High, South High Community, Claremont Academy, and North Brookfield High. Science proficiency, however, was only 24.00%, far below the state's 40.50% and behind Bay Path (51.09%), Wachusett (46.92%), Leicester (44.30%), and Auburn (37.35%). Math proficiency was 38.46%, below the state's 43.73%; it beat Leicester, Doherty, South High, and Claremont but trailed Wachusett, Bay Path, University Pk Campus School, and Auburn.
Completion outcomes are a major concern. In 2024–2025, graduation was 77.0% and dropout was 12.2%, close to the district but weak against most nearby schools; only North Brookfield High had a lower graduation rate, and dropout was third-highest. The school has a favorable 9.9 student-teacher ratio and mid-to-high per-pupil spending of $17,944, yet science and completion remain weak, suggesting resources alone do not explain the pattern. Subgroup data show relatively stronger results for Hispanic and low-income students (around the 56th–57th percentile, 3 stars) but persistent weakness for special education students (about 16th–18th percentile, 1 star). Leicester High has a similar overall rank (201st, 43rd percentile) but a very different profile: much lower ELA, much higher science, and a 93.1% graduation rate. Key questions are why science lags so far behind ELA, why completion remains weak despite test-score gains, and how to improve special education outcomes.
Thank you for your feedback!