Summary
Springfield Elementary School is a PK–6 school in Michigan City, Indiana, serving 312 students in the Michigan City Area Schools district. Its 2025–26 rank is 745th of 1,015 Indiana elementary schools (27th percentile, 1 star), down from 604th of 1,016 (41st percentile, 2 stars) in 2022–23, and the school has now been at 1 star for two consecutive years. In 2024–25, 63.78% of students were eligible for free/reduced lunch, down from 77.97% in 2022–23; per-student spending was $14,326 in 2023–24, and the student-teacher ratio was 15.9 in 2024–25.
Springfield’s most striking local difference is chronic absenteeism: 30.7% in 2024–25, higher than nearby same-district elementary schools ranging from 18.0% to 22.6% and nearly double Indiana’s 16.7%. Test proficiency is low and uneven. In 2025–26, all-grade results were 25.64% ELA, 32.05% math, and 24.10% science. Among nearby same-district schools, math ranks 6th of 7, above only Edgewood Elementary School. Compared with nearby schools outside the district, Riley Elementary School, F Willard Crichfield Elementary, and Renaissance Academy Charter School are higher in every all-grade subject. Fourth grade is a major weak point: ELA 13.51% vs district 33.13% and state 42.2%; math 27.03% vs district 48.3% and state 52%; science 13.51% vs district 26.23% and state 43.8%. Fifth-grade social studies is also weak: 17.95% vs district 28.78% and state 47.2%. Sixth grade is a relative bright spot: ELA 36.96% vs district 24.65%, math 30.43% vs district 29.36%, and science 32.61% vs district 23.4%, though still below state benchmarks.
Spending is not low, but outcomes lag. Springfield Elementary School spends $14,326 per student, yet F Willard Crichfield Elementary spends $9,631 and posts 52.25% ELA, 69.66% math, and 68.75% science, while Renaissance Academy Charter School spends $8,109 and posts 46.53% ELA, 50.69% math, and 51.85% science. Springfield’s higher poverty rate helps explain part of the gap, but the contrast remains notable. Overall, the school faces low proficiency, very high chronic absenteeism, a sharp fourth-grade weakness, and a recent downward ranking trend; its sixth-grade outcomes and math performance slightly above the district are real strengths but do not offset the larger pattern.
Thank you for your feedback!