Beta You're viewing our redesigned school page. Prefer the classic layout?

New rankings! California test scores for the 2025-26 school year were just released — SchoolDigger posted updated rankings this week.

Be the first to know when we post new rankings!

The MET

Q: Is The MET a good school?

The MET ranks 961 st of 2137 California high schools. SchoolDigger rates this school 3 stars out of 5.

Public, Charter Grades 9-12

961^st

SchoolDigger Rank ?

of 2,137 California High Schools

Better than 55% of California high schools

Summary

The MET is a 190-student high school serving grades 9–12 in Sacramento, in the Sacramento City Unified district. Its 2025–26 results were sharply mixed: English and Science were above state and district results, while Mathematics was far below both. The clearest concern is Mathematics: just 7% of students were proficient, compared with 38% statewide and 32% in the district.

Compared with nearby schools, the MET ranked third in ELA and second in Science, but eighth in Mathematics among the nine schools with reported all-grade results. ELA proficiency was 55%, versus 49% statewide and 41% in the district; Science was 37%, compared with 36% statewide and 30% in the district. The nearby-school leaders included Washington Middle College High in both subjects. Attendance is another standout: chronic absenteeism was 4%, below the state’s 18%, the district’s 27%, and every nearby school with a reported rate. Graduation was 94%, compared with 88% in both the state and district.

Results have changed unevenly over time: Mathematics fell 11 percentage points from 2022–23 to 2025–26, while ELA rose 7 points; Science dropped sharply, then rebounded, and remains only 1 point above the state. SchoolDigger rated the school at the 55th statewide percentile with 3 stars in 2025–26, a middle-of-the-pack standing that masks the subject differences. Its 2024–25 student-teacher ratio was 17.1, compared with a nearby-school average of 18.2, and 44% of students were free/reduced lunch eligible that year. SchoolDigger’s group rankings also differed notably: White Students ranked at the 21st percentile in 2025–26, below the school’s overall 55th percentile, while Special Education Students ranked at the 85th percentile in 2024–25, above the school’s overall 50th percentile that year. Nearby schools have varying grade spans, and the school’s enrollment of 190 means year-to-year percentages may vary more.

190

Students ?

17.1

Student/teacher ratio ?

$37,776

Per pupil spending ?

43.7%

Free/reduced lunch eligible (2024-25) ?

All students in California receive free school meals.

810 V St.
Sacramento, CA 95818-1330

(916) 395-5417

District: Sacramento City Unified

Racial breakdown:

Hispanic:

45.3%

White:

32.6%

African American:

9.5%

See top rated California high schools

Compare The MET to nearby high schools!

At a glance

▬ Ranking trend: Holding steady — 54th percentile in 2015 → 55th in 2026

Strengths

✓94% graduate in 4 years — above the California average (88%)

✓Above the California median (55th percentile)

Worth a look

!Test scores below the California average (34% vs 42% meeting standards)

!Some student groups rank well below the school's overall statewide standing

!Mathematics scores 31 pts below the California average

Students meeting standards (2025-2026) ?

This school34%

District avg35%

California avg42%

961^st of 2,137

California public high schools ?

Top 45%▼ down 14 pts since 2016

From top 31% (2016) to top 45% (2026)

See the entire ranking list of California High Schools →

★★★★★

SchoolDigger rating ?

6^th of 14High Schools in the Sacramento City Unified

617^th of 968Sacramento City Unified among California districts

Statewide rank percentile over time (100 = the top-ranked school in the state; click a legend item to add a student group)

Show full rank history (all student groups)

All Students

Year	Avg score	Statewide rank	California percentile	Rating
2026	53.6	961 of 2137	55.0%	★★★☆☆
2025	47.5	1083 of 2162	49.9%	★★☆☆☆
2024	41.5	1204 of 2159	44.2%	★★☆☆☆
2023	61.5	730 of 2170	66.4%	★★★☆☆
2022	71.2	511 of 2123	75.9%	★★★★☆
2019	50.0	980 of 2133	54.1%	★★★☆☆
2018	43.7	1147 of 2017	43.1%	★★☆☆☆
2017	51.2	995 of 2021	50.8%	★★★☆☆
2016	66.4	640 of 2039	68.6%	★★★☆☆
2015	53.3	913 of 1994	54.2%	★★★☆☆
2013	42.6	996 of 2426	58.9%	★★★☆☆
2012	35.6	1163 of 2354	50.6%	★★★☆☆
2011	40.3	1054 of 2367	55.5%	★★★☆☆
2010	37.5	1069 of 2281	53.1%	★★★☆☆
2009	40.5	1002 of 2238	55.2%	★★★☆☆
2008	47.9	718 of 2117	66.1%	★★★☆☆
2007	37.5	942 of 2063	54.3%	★★★☆☆
2006	39.3	850 of 1968	56.8%	★★★☆☆
2005	31.6	1008 of 1901	47.0%	★★☆☆☆
2004	81.6	63 of 1653	96.2%	★★★★★

Female

Year	Avg score	Statewide rank	California percentile	Rating
2026	47.0	980 of 1865	47.5%	★★☆☆☆
2025	38.8	1149 of 1906	39.7%	★★☆☆☆
2024	32.0	1289 of 1915	32.7%	★★☆☆☆
2023	57.7	725 of 1915	62.1%	★★★☆☆
2022	64.4	545 of 1858	70.7%	★★★★☆
2019	37.3	1121 of 1833	38.8%	★★☆☆☆
2018	34.4	1198 of 1760	31.9%	★★☆☆☆

Hispanic

Year	Avg score	Statewide rank	California percentile	Rating
2026	55.9	783 of 1880	58.4%	★★★☆☆
2025	40.2	1154 of 1900	39.3%	★★☆☆☆
2024	40.6	1144 of 1902	39.9%	★★☆☆☆
2023	66.6	542 of 1917	71.7%	★★★★☆
2022	62.9	552 of 1861	70.3%	★★★★☆
2019	38.7	1116 of 1814	38.5%	★★☆☆☆
2018	38.9	1115 of 1742	36.0%	★★☆☆☆

Low Socio Economic Status

Year	Avg score	Statewide rank	California percentile	Rating
2026	51.5	939 of 1999	53.0%	★★★☆☆
2025	43.7	1130 of 2013	43.9%	★★☆☆☆
2024	39.0	1244 of 2026	38.6%	★★☆☆☆
2023	70.4	470 of 2030	76.8%	★★★★☆
2022	76.3	334 of 1943	82.8%	★★★★☆
2019	50.4	918 of 1937	52.6%	★★★☆☆
2018	45.2	1075 of 1862	42.3%	★★☆☆☆

Male

Year	Avg score	Statewide rank	California percentile	Rating
2026	56.5	794 of 1932	58.9%	★★★☆☆
2025	47.7	968 of 1942	50.2%	★★★☆☆
2024	51.6	852 of 1948	56.3%	★★★☆☆
2023	58.9	692 of 1963	64.7%	★★★☆☆
2022	71.6	460 of 1916	76.0%	★★★★☆
2019	61.6	635 of 1880	66.2%	★★★☆☆
2018	48.4	945 of 1834	48.5%	★★☆☆☆

Special Education

Year	Avg score	Statewide rank	California percentile	Rating
2025	74.9	186 of 1252	85.1%	★★★★☆

White

Year	Avg score	Statewide rank	California percentile	Rating
2026	24.3	899 of 1132	20.6%	★☆☆☆☆
2024	30.2	853 of 1173	27.3%	★☆☆☆☆
2023	61.6	458 of 1193	61.6%	★★★☆☆
2022	71.6	306 of 1204	74.6%	★★★★☆
2019	46.6	673 of 1222	44.9%	★★☆☆☆
2018	38.3	771 of 1173	34.3%	★★☆☆☆

How student groups rank statewide ? (each group's percentile vs the same group at other schools — higher is better; the +/- beside each compares the group with this school's overall percentile)

Special Education (2025)85th percentile+35 vs school

Male (2026)59th percentile+4 vs school

Hispanic (2026)58th percentile+3 vs school

Low Socio Economic Status (2026)53rd percentile~ school

Female (2026)47th percentile-8 vs school

White (2026)21st percentile-34 vs school

By subject vs California (2025-2026) ?

English Language Arts/Literacy55%+5 vs state

Science37%~ state avg

Mathematics7%-31 vs state

5.0

1 rating · 1 written review

5★1

4★0

3★0

2★0

1★0

Rate The MET

Have first-hand experience? A quick rating - and a sentence or two about what stands out (teachers, academics, safety, communication) - helps other families know what to expect.

Takes about a minute. We email you a link to verify your review - your address is never shown publicly.

Tap a star to rate

What people are saying

by a parent
Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Our daughter was drawn to this school because of the flexible atmosphere and the sense of personal freedom and responsibility. She felt it would be a good fit for her.

As parents, we agreed that there was some appeal to the methods applied at The Met but we were somewhat insecure about the non-traditional approach. We had concerns that if this unfamiliar approach was ineffective that we would have risked our daughters' ability to be accepted to the college of her choosing. In the beginning it felt like a gamble we weren't certain we were willing to take and we didn't know how long we could allow this test.

We agreed to allow her to attend The Met because we felt that Allen was personally interested in and connected to each student. He appeared to be the sort of person we could effectively communicate with and work with to achieve our desired results.

We were right and we are all delighted that we took this path. Our daughter has an internship that she loves and is learning and gaining experience beyond what we imagined. Her advisor, Vince Wolfe is the perfect combination of educator, leader, friend and mentor. Allen Young proved to be everything we expected and more. He is approachable, involved, responsive and effective. He has supported our daughter and every student, as though she were his only student. The personal attention one would hope for but seldom receives. We love The Met. Our daughter is a sophmore and is already scoring very high on her PSAT and other standardized tests. She is excelling in every academic area. She is enthusiastic about school and thoroughly enjoys her studies and the community at school.

For our family, The Met is the best possible choice. Close Quote

Schools Near The MET

Load more schools when map is moved

Ranking:

E Elementary M Middle H High A Alternative P Private

Choose columns to see: Summary School Students/Teachers Ranking Test Scores Finance All

School													Students/Teachers											Ranking (2026)				Ranking (2025)				CAST Science (2026)				Smarter Balanced Assessments English Language Arts/Literacy (2026)					Smarter Balanced Assessments Mathematics (2026)					Per Pupil Expenditures (2025)
Name	Type	Grades	Address	City	Zip	County	District	Is Charter	Is Magnet	Is Virtual	Is Title I	Phone	Enrollment	Full-time Teachers	Student/ Teacher Ratio	Free/reduced lunch (2024-25)	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	American Indian	Pacific Islander	Two or More Races	Average Standard Score (2026)	Statewide Rank (2026)	State Percentile (2026)	SchoolDigger Rating (2026)	Average Standard Score (2025)	Statewide Rank (2025)	State Percentile (2025)	Rank Change from Previous Year	CAST Science 8th Grade	CAST Science 11th Grade	CAST Science 12th Grade	CAST Science All Grades	Smarter Balanced Assessments English Language Arts/Literacy 6th Grade	Smarter Balanced Assessments English Language Arts/Literacy 7th Grade	Smarter Balanced Assessments English Language Arts/Literacy 8th Grade	Smarter Balanced Assessments English Language Arts/Literacy 11th Grade	Smarter Balanced Assessments English Language Arts/Literacy All Grades	Smarter Balanced Assessments Mathematics 6th Grade	Smarter Balanced Assessments Mathematics 7th Grade	Smarter Balanced Assessments Mathematics 8th Grade	Smarter Balanced Assessments Mathematics 11th Grade	Smarter Balanced Assessments Mathematics All Grades	Per Pupil Expenditures Total	Sub-total from Federal Funds	Sub-total from State/Local Funds
The MET	Public, Charter	9-12	810 V St.	Sacramento	95818	Sacramento County	Sacramento City Unified	Yes	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(916) 395-5417	190	11	17.1	43.7%	62 (32.6%)	18 (9.5%)	86 (45.3%)	4 (2.1%)	1 (0.5%)	0 (0.0%)	18 (9.5%)	53.6	961^st of 2137 public high schools	55.0%		47.5	1083^rd of 2162 public high schools	49.9%	122		31.0	43.9	37.4				54.8	54.8				7.3	7.3	$37,776	$34,396	$3,380
Arthur A. Benjamin Health Professions High	Public	9-12	451 McClatchy Way	Sacramento	95818	Sacramento County	Sacramento City Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(916) 395-5010	156	12	13.4	62.8%	15 (9.6%)	28 (17.9%)	87 (55.8%)	11 (7.1%)	2 (1.3%)	7 (4.5%)	6 (3.8%)	58.6	844^th of 2137 public high schools	60.5%		47.2	1094^th of 2162 public high schools	49.4%	250		34.4	37.0	35.6				57.6	57.6				20.6	20.6	$51,661	$48,626	$3,035
C. K. McClatchy High	Public	9-12	3066 Freeport Blvd.	Sacramento	95818	Sacramento County	Sacramento City Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(916) 395-5050	2,569	103	24.9	50.3%	638 (24.8%)	216 (8.4%)	1,095 (42.6%)	318 (12.4%)	13 (0.5%)	38 (1.5%)	249 (9.7%)	59.2	830^th of 2137 public high schools	61.2%		56.2	902^nd of 2162 public high schools	58.3%	72		35.0	33.0	34.0				51.1	51.1				28.2	28.2	$20,860	$17,628	$3,232
Yolo High	Public	9-12	919 Westacre Rd.	West Sacramento	95691	Yolo County	Washington Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(916) 375-7740	75	7	10.7	89.3%	14 (18.7%)	6 (8.0%)	46 (61.3%)	5 (6.7%)	2 (2.7%)	0 (0.0%)	2 (2.7%)	8.3	2037^th of 2137 public high schools	4.7%		9.3	2049^th of 2162 public high schools	5.2%	12		0.0		0.0				9.4	9.4				3.5	3.5
Sacramento Charter High	Public, Charter	9-12	2315 34th St.	Sacramento	95817	Sacramento County	Sacramento Charter High District	Yes	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(916) 277-6200	413	18	23.3	75.5%	11 (2.7%)	239 (57.9%)	111 (26.9%)	5 (1.2%)	2 (0.5%)	2 (0.5%)	43 (10.4%)								(n/a)
American Legion High (Continuation)	Public	9-12	3801 Broadway	Sacramento	95817	Sacramento County	Sacramento City Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(916) 395-5000	163	16	10.3	77.9%	10 (6.1%)	32 (19.6%)	98 (60.1%)	7 (4.3%)	3 (1.8%)	6 (3.7%)	7 (4.3%)	11.9	1848^th of 2137 public high schools	13.5%		13.5	1857^th of 2162 public high schools	14.1%	9		6.0	10.3	7.3				11.9	11.9				3.0	3.0	$54,796	$51,080	$3,716
Washington Middle College High	Public, Charter	9-12	637 Todhunder Ave.	West Sacramento	95691	Yolo County	Washington Unified	Yes	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(916) 375-7901	171	7	24.1	68.4%	58 (33.9%)	4 (2.3%)	75 (43.9%)	24 (14.0%)	0 (0.0%)	1 (0.6%)	9 (5.3%)	92.2	155^th of 2137 public high schools	92.7%		93.8	128^th of 2162 public high schools	94.1%	27		62.5		62.5				85.7	85.7				50.0	50.0
River City High	Public	9-12	1 Raider Ln.	West Sacramento	95691	Yolo County	Washington Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(916) 375-7800	2,168	99	21.9	67.7%	584 (26.9%)	111 (5.1%)	961 (44.3%)	315 (14.5%)	6 (0.3%)	50 (2.3%)	137 (6.3%)	45.1	1140^th of 2137 public high schools	46.7%		61.1	794^th of 2162 public high schools	63.3%	346		27.0		27.1				47.8	47.8				23.0	23.0
Leroy Greene Academy	Public, Charter	6-12	2950 West River Dr.	Sacramento	95833	Sacramento County	Natomas Unified	Yes	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(916) 567-5560	755	40	19.0	63.0%	116 (15.4%)	103 (13.6%)	334 (44.2%)	118 (15.6%)	2 (0.3%)	9 (1.2%)	73 (9.7%)	56.2	896^th of 2137 public high schools	58.1%		58.7	854^th of 2162 public high schools	60.5%	42	22.5	38.5		29.8	44.6	53.2	42.9	57.7	49.6	31.5	37.1	21.8	20.2	28.6	$28,876	$27,464	$1,412
Umoja International Academy	Public	7-12	5301 N St.	Sacramento	95819	Sacramento County	Sacramento City Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(916) 395-5350	412	24	17.2	68.0%	80 (19.4%)	60 (14.6%)	191 (46.4%)	33 (8.0%)	6 (1.5%)	6 (1.5%)	36 (8.7%)	76.5	485^th of 2137 public high schools	77.3%		94.5	107^th of 2162 public high schools	95.1%	378	18.6	42.4	65.2	28.7		33.3	24.6	78.8	34.9		10.9	12.6	27.3	13.8	$33,066	$28,948	$4,118

Frequently Asked Questions about The MET

Is The MET a good school?

The MET ranks 961^st of 2137 California high schools. SchoolDigger rates this school 3 stars out of 5.

What district is The MET in?

Sacramento City Unified

What is the racial makeup of The MET?

Students at The MET are 45% Hispanic, 33% White, 9% African American, 9% Two or more races, 2% Asian.

How many students attend The MET?

In the 2024-25 school year, 190 students attended The MET.

Rate The MET!

Other helpful SchoolDigger resources...

Compare to nearby schools

CACalifornia High School Rankings

CACalifornia District Rankings

Schools in Sacramento, CA

Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for The MET!

Latest California data All new data »

2025–26 attendance data, dropout rates & graduation ratesNewOct 15, 2026

2025–26 CAST, CSA Spanish & Smarter Balanced Assessments scoresNewOct 15, 2026

2024–25 school spending dataJul 1, 2026

2024–25 attendance dataMar 13, 2026

SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the California Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.