The MET

Public, Charter 9-12

 810 V St.
       Sacramento, CA  95818-1330


 (916) 395-5417

District: Sacramento City Unified

SchoolDigger Rank:
979th of 2,125 California High Schools


Student/teacher ratio:  22.4
Number of students:  281

Racial breakdown:

Hispanic:
39.1%
White:
34.2%
African American:
13.2%
more

Free/discounted lunch recipients:  58.4%

Homes for sale View homes for sale near The MET

 See top rated California high schools

 Compare The MET to nearby high schools!
We updated the 2018-19 rankings and test scores for this school on Wednesday, October 9, 2019.


Performance Trends
Compare Details In 2019, The MET ranked better than 53.9% of high schools in California. It also ranked 8th among 13 ranked high schools in the Sacramento City Unified School District. (See more...)
Compare Details In 2019 the calculated Average Standard Score was 53.89. (See more...)
Student Body
Compare Details Student population at The MET is diverse. Racial makeup is: Hispanic (39.1%), White (34.2%), African American (13.2%). (See more...)
Compare Details 58.4% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. (See more...)
Teachers
Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at The MET is 22.4. 8 high schools in the Sacramento City Unified School District have better student/teacher ratios. (See more...)
Compare The MET employs 12.5 full-time teachers.
Map of The MET
Schooldigger 2019 Rankings:

The MET:

SchoolDigger ranks The MET 979th of 2125 California public high schools. (See The MET in the ranking list.)

Sacramento City Unified:

SchoolDigger ranks Sacramento City Unified 1032nd of 1512 California school districts. (See district ranking list.)

Average Parent Rating:

Read all reviews and ratings detail for The MET.

What do you think?

Your rating for The MET?

Rank History for The MET

Compare
Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2004 81.58 63rd 1653 96.2%
2005 31.57 1008th 1901 47.0%
2006 39.34 850th 1968 56.8%
2007 37.50 942nd 2063 54.3%
2008 47.92 718th 2117 66.1%
2009 40.53 1002nd 2238 55.2%
2010 37.49 1069th 2281 53.1%
2011 40.31 1054th 2367 55.5%
2012 35.55 1163rd 2354 50.6%
2013 42.58 996th 2426 58.9%
2015 53.26 913th 1994 54.2%
2016 66.41 640th 2039 68.6%
2017 51.15 995th 2021 50.8%
2018 43.67 1147th 2017 43.1%
2019 53.89 979th 2125 53.9%

Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

The MET Test Scores
Tests: 
  
Grades: 
  
Years: 
  
Group by: 
  
District Scores: 
  
State Scores: 



Data source: California Department of Education

Review counts

All ratings (Avg rating: 5)
100%

0%

0%

0%

0%

  

by a parent
Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Open Quote Our daughter was drawn to this school because of the flexible atmosphere and the sense of personal freedom and responsibility. She felt it would be a good fit for her.

As parents, we agreed that there was some appeal to the methods applied at The Met but we were somewhat insecure about the non-traditional approach. We had concerns that if this unfamiliar approach was ineffective that we would have risked our daughters' ability to be accepted to the college of her choosing. In the beginning it felt like a gamble we weren't certain we were willing to take and we didn't know how long we could allow this test.

We agreed to allow her to attend The Met because we felt that Allen was personally interested in and connected to each student. He appeared to be the sort of person we could effectively communicate with and work with to achieve our desired results.

We were right and we are all delighted that we took this path. Our daughter has an internship that she loves and is learning and gaining experience beyond what we imagined. Her advisor, Vince Wolfe is the perfect combination of educator, leader, friend and mentor. Allen Young proved to be everything we expected and more. He is approachable, involved, responsive and effective. He has supported our daughter and every student, as though she were his only student. The personal attention one would hope for but seldom receives. We love The Met. Our daughter is a sophmore and is already scoring very high on her PSAT and other standardized tests. She is excelling in every academic area. She is enthusiastic about school and thoroughly enjoys her studies and the community at school.

For our family, The Met is the best possible choice. Close Quote



Enrollment information for The MET

Compare
Year White African American Asian Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Not Specified Total
2004 22 13 8 17 0 n/a n/a 0 60
2005 33 13 9 25 2 n/a n/a 0 82
2006 67 18 6 24 2 n/a n/a 3 120
2007 70 21 8 39 4 n/a n/a 3 145
2008 64 28 4 37 2 n/a n/a 0 135
2009 80 24 6 53 2 0 0 0 165
2010 87 26 2 88 0 1 31 0 235
2011 100 26 5 100 2 5 33 0 271
2012 120 32 6 80 3 3 28 0 272
2013 170 23 9 82 6 4 19 0 313
2014 151 31 11 82 6 1 24 0 306
2015 146 37 9 90 6 0 24 0 312
2016 129 30 6 102 6 2 28 0 303
2017 108 34 6 98 2 1 28 0 277
2018 96 37 8 110 1 1 28 0 281

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity
For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at The MET

Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
2004 60 4.0 15.0 60.0
2005 82 6.0 13.7 37.8
2006 120 7.0 17.1 26.5
2007 145 8.0 18.1 38.0
2008 135 8.0 16.9 41.5
2009 165 8.0 16.5 44.2
2010 235 12.0 19.5 45.1
2011 271 n/a n/a 43.2
2012 272 8.6 31.6 1.1
2013 313 10.2 30.6 40.6
2014 306 12.0 25.5 55.9
2015 312 12.0 26.0 52.2
2016 303 12.0 25.2 52.8
2017 277 12.0 23.0 54.2
2018 281 12.5 22.4 58.4

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch
For information about the National School Lunch Program, see the USDA Website

Student/Teacher Ratio The MET

Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
2004 60 4.0 15.0 60.0
2005 82 6.0 13.7 37.8
2006 120 7.0 17.1 26.5
2007 145 8.0 18.1 38.0
2008 135 8.0 16.9 41.5
2009 165 8.0 16.5 44.2
2010 235 12.0 19.5 45.1
2011 271 n/a n/a 43.2
2012 272 8.6 31.6 1.1
2013 313 10.2 30.6 40.6
2014 306 12.0 25.5 55.9
2015 312 12.0 26.0 52.2
2016 303 12.0 25.2 52.8
2017 277 12.0 23.0 54.2
2018 281 12.5 22.4 58.4

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio
Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.




Rate The MET!

Homes for sale near The MET:







Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for The MET!




SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the California Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that school and district boundary data are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.





Diagnostics