Summary:
Tahoe-Truckee Unified has 11 schools: five elementary schools, two middle schools, three high schools and one alternative school, serving students from elementary through high school. In 2025–2026, the reported school averages were above state proficiency rates in all three subjects: 64% in ELA versus 49% statewide, 55% in math versus 38%, and 49% in science among the eight schools other than Sierra versus 36%. The most important takeaway is that results vary sharply by school: the reported ranges are 41 percentage points in ELA, 54 in math and, excluding Sierra’s distinct continuation-school result, 31 in science.
Glenshire Elementary is the strongest broad-based conventional-school standout, leading conventional schools in ELA at 77% and science at 65%, and placing second in math at 71%; those results are 28, 29 and 33 points above state rates, respectively. Donner Trail Elementary has the highest reported ELA and math results, at 86% and 90%, but enrolls just 55 students and its current science result is suppressed. At the lower end, Kings Beach Elementary has the lowest reported ELA result, 45%, while North Tahoe High has the lowest reported math result, 36%. Sierra High (Continuation) reports 7% proficiency in science, but its specialized setting makes it a different comparison from conventional schools.
Recent changes are mixed: across the same nine schools, mean ELA rose by 1 point and the state-to-school math advantage narrowed from 17 to 16 points; among seven schools with comparable science results, the mean rose by 5 points, compared with a 3-point state increase. Individual shifts vary: Kings Beach’s science result rose by 21 points, while Tahoe Lake Elementary’s fell by 18. SchoolDigger ranked Glenshire at the 92nd statewide percentile and gave it five stars in both 2024–2025 and 2025–2026. Context also differs: Glenshire’s 2024–2025 student–teacher ratio was 23.9, and the schools’ free/reduced lunch eligible figures for 2024–2025 ranged from 5% at Donner Trail to 49% at Truckee Elementary. These figures are context, not explanations for results; small enrollment and specialized settings also limit direct comparisons.
Thank you for your feedback!