Summary
Greenfield Junior High School serves 1,160 students in grades 6–8 in Gilbert, Arizona, in the Gilbert Unified District. Its latest supplied results show strong performance in English language arts (ELA), math, and science, and SchoolDigger ranked it in the 86th percentile statewide with 4 stars in 2025–26. The most important takeaway is that Greenfield is among the area’s strongest schools, with results well above state proficiency rates in all three subjects.
Greenfield stands out most in math and science, while eighth-grade ELA is its clearest relative weakness. In 2025–26, all-grade ELA proficiency was 60%—19 points above the state, 2 above the district, and third among nearby schools; the nearby-school average was 48%. Math was 54%—21 points above the state and 2 above the district, also third locally, compared with a nearby average of 36%. In 2024–25 science, Greenfield scored 54%, 24 points above the state and 10 above the district, ranking second locally against a nearby average of 36%. Franklin Junior High School led nearby schools in all three subjects. Within Greenfield, seventh-grade ELA was 71%, compared with 50% in eighth grade; the eighth-grade result was 2 points below the district, though 11 above the state.
Science improved after holding steady: proficiency rose from 43% in both 2022–23 and 2023–24 to 54% in 2024–25, and Greenfield’s lead over the state widened from 16 to 24 points. SchoolDigger’s overall percentile also rose from 79 in 2023–24 to 86 in 2025–26, though Franklin Junior High School (97) and Highland Junior High School (88) ranked higher most recently. Greenfield’s student-teacher ratio was 20.7, the highest among nearby schools, compared with their average of 18.2. SchoolDigger’s student-group rankings show a notable contrast: the Multi-racial Students ranking rose to the 65th percentile in 2025–26 from 30 in each of the two prior years, while the Special Education Students ranking was at the 44th percentile in 2022–23, down from 85 in 2020–21. ELA and math trends cannot be assessed from the single recent year supplied, and the subgroup ranking years are not current.
Thank you for your feedback!