Summary
Portsmouth Elementary is a PK–6 school in Portsmouth, OH, serving 791 students in the Portsmouth City district, making it the largest elementary school in this nearby southern Ohio comparison group. It is ranked 1118th of 1560 Ohio elementary schools in 2025–2026 (28th percentile, 1 star), while the district is ranked 644th of 773 Ohio districts (17th percentile, 1 star). Its statewide percentile has generally stayed between 24 and 29 since 2015–2016, with a slight uptick from 25 in 2024–2025 to 28 in 2025–2026.
Academically, Portsmouth Elementary scored below Ohio in 8 of 9 reported tested areas in 2025–2026. The main bright spots are 6th grade math, where 58.0% were proficient—above both the district and the state’s 56.2%—and 5th grade ELA at 62.0%, which is above the district but below Ohio’s 70.4%. The clearest red flags are upper-grade ELA: 4th grade ELA was 38.0% and 6th grade ELA was 33.0%, with 6th grade ELA declining from 41.1% over the last four reported years. Science has stayed stable but low, around 20 points below the state. Compared with nearby schools, Portsmouth Elementary generally trails Bloom-Vernon Elementary School, Northwest Elementary School, Clay Elementary School, Valley Elementary School, and Wheelersburg Elementary School in most subjects, while outperforming East Portsmouth Elementary in several areas.
Chronic absenteeism is a major challenge: 30.4% in 2025–2026, below the district’s 36.6% but tied with East Portsmouth Elementary for the highest rate among nearby schools. After improving to 16.8% in 2023–2024, it rose to 21.4% and then 30.4%. The school’s 2024–2025 student-teacher ratio of 13.4 is relatively favorable, and its 2018–2019 per-student spending of $9,193 is mid-to-high locally, so low staffing or spending alone do not explain the achievement pattern. For student groups, effectiveness rankings improved for low-income students (33rd percentile) and special education students (45th percentile) in 2025–2026, though both remain below the state midpoint. Free/reduced lunch data are missing, spending data are old, and some subgroup results are based on small numbers, so these findings are suggestive rather than definitive.
Thank you for your feedback!