Summary
Miguel Sepulveda Elementary School in Sparks, NV, is a PK–5 school serving 532 students in the Washoe County district. The district ranks 4th of 12 in Nevada, but the school’s own recent statewide standing is lower: in 2025–2026 it ranked 219th of 376 Nevada elementary schools—42nd percentile, 2 stars—down from 170th of 379, 55th percentile, 3 stars in 2024–2025 and a peak of 82nd of 341, 76th percentile, 4 stars in 2017–2018. That makes it a school that has historically been around or above the middle but is currently below its earlier levels and the district’s overall standing.
Academically, the school is uneven. Math is a relative strength: 39.3% all-grade proficiency in 2025–2026, above the district’s 37.0% and the state’s 36.2%, with 4th-grade math at 51.8% versus district 45.3% and state 43.4%. Reading is mixed at 40.3%, below district 44.4% and state 45.2%; 5th-grade reading is the largest gap at 34.1% versus district 53.7% and state 52.7%. Science is a major weakness at 12.0%, far below district 26.3% and state 25.5%, and it has been below both for multiple years. Chronic absenteeism is a real strength at 18.3%, better than district 27.5% and state 25.5%, though nearby Florence Drake Elementary (13.4%), Bud Beasley Elementary (13.6%), Lena Juniper Elementary (14.6%), and Lloyd Diedrichsen Elementary (15.1%) are lower.
The school serves a lower-poverty population than many nearby schools—27.95% free/reduced lunch in 2023–2024—compared with schools near 100%, such as Greenbrae Elementary, Lena Juniper Elementary, Florence Drake Elementary, Virginia Palmer Elementary, and Sun Valley Elementary, and Katherine Dunn Elementary at 99.78%. Yet several higher-poverty nearby schools outperform it. Similar-poverty peers John Bohach Elementary School (~26.38%) and Bud Beasley Elementary (~31.17%) also have higher math, reading, and science results; the lower-spending peer spends $10,464 versus $12,988, so spending and class size do not simply explain the pattern. Older 2017–2018 subgroup data flagged lower relative outcomes for low-income and English learner students, suggesting equity monitoring may be worthwhile. Overall, the school is a mid-sized, lower-poverty school with math strengths and good attendance, but a recent decline driven by reading and especially science, placing it lower-middle among nearby schools.
Thank you for your feedback!