Summary
Prodeo Columbia Heights Middle is a grades 6–8 charter middle school in Columbia Heights, Minnesota, part of the Prodeo Academy district, enrolling 291 students in a high-poverty community where 89% of students were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch in 2024–25.
Statewide, the school ranks 489th of 546 ranked Minnesota schools in 2025–26 — the 10th percentile, with a 1-star rating. That continues a weak run: after a 2021–22 high of 344th of 520 (34th percentile, 2 stars), the school has mostly sat between the 9th and 20th percentiles, including 0 stars in 2023–24 and 1 star in each of the last two reported years. In 2025–26, all-grades proficiency is Math 14.2%, Reading 21.3%, and Science 1.5%. The school trails its own district in all three (district Math 30.4%, Reading 28.1%, Science 4.8%) and trails the state by wide margins (state Math 44.9%, Reading 48.6%, Science 25.5%). Science is the sharpest concern: it fell from 22.69% in 2022–23 to 18.9%, then 6.02% in 2024–25, and now 1.5% — lower than every nearby school with reported science scores.
Compared with nearby schools, Prodeo edges Columbia Academy by a few rank spots and in overall Math, and outperforms KIPP North Star Academy and Olson Middle in Math and Reading, but sits far below Northeast Middle, Fridley Middle, St. Anthony Middle, and Highview Middle School. (Columbia Academy Anchor Program and Fridley Middle Area Learning Center have no comparable current test data, and Anchor's scores are suppressed by the state.) Grade-level results weaken in upper grades: Math was 18.3% in 6th, 13.7% in 7th, and 10.4% in 8th; Reading was 26.8%, 17.8%, and 19.4%. Some subgroups rank above the school's overall standing — English Language Learners reached the 61st percentile with 3 stars in 2025–26, up from the 46th percentile in 2024–25 — while Special Education students rank in the 11th percentile, female students 7th, male students 14th, and low-income students 14th. Nearby higher-performing schools generally have lower poverty rates, but that context does not fully explain the gap.
Thank you for your feedback!