Summary
Carlton is a K–5 elementary school with 247 students in Salem, MA, a coastal city north of Boston. In 2025–2026 it ranks 509th of 899 Massachusetts schools (43rd percentile, 2 stars), above its district, Salem, which ranks 288th of 351 districts (18th percentile, 1 star), and above every nearby same-district school. Its history is mid-tier, with 58th–59th percentile in 2015–16 and 2017–18, then mostly 33rd–48th since; it is now at the 43rd percentile, up from 38th.
Academically, Carlton beats the Salem district in all three subjects: ELA 40.83% (district 30.36%, state 40.03%), math 32.5% (district 25.46%, state 41.11%), and science 42.86% (district 29.64%, state 40.98%). Science is a strength and ELA is essentially at the state average, while math trails the state by roughly 8.6 points. Carlton posts the highest ELA and science proficiency among same-district neighbors, ahead of Saltonstall School, Bates, Witchcraft Heights, Horace Mann Laboratory, and Bentley Academy Innovation School, but its math sits below Bates (38.55%) and Witchcraft Heights (34.93%). Nearby schools in Beverly and Danvers score higher in ELA and math — Ayers/Ryal Side School (55.9% ELA, 67.08% math), Cove Elementary (54.48%, 58.52%), and Riverside (44.64%, 46.9%) — though Carlton's science beats Riverside's. Carlton clearly outperforms Peabody's William A Welch Senior and Thomas Carroll. Grade-level results show standout 3rd-grade ELA (56.1%) and weak 4th-grade math (27.03%, below both district and state).
Resources look favorable: the smallest enrollment and lowest student-teacher ratio (10.4) of nearby schools, plus $20,385 in per-student spending in 2020–2021, above most peers, though that figure is dated. Subgroup effectiveness is uneven — special education students rank at the 56th percentile (3 stars), above the school's overall 43rd, while low-income students rank at the 23rd percentile (1 star), down from 32nd and 44th in the two prior years, the clearest equity concern. With small grade cohorts and some older or missing data, year-to-year swings should be read cautiously.
Thank you for your feedback!