Summary
James S Daley Middle School is a grades 5–8 school in Lowell, MA, serving 669 students as part of Lowell Public Schools, and it stands out as a 4-star, top-quartile school even though the district overall ranks much lower.
In 2025–2026, Daley ranked 112th of 478 Massachusetts schools (77th percentile, 4 stars), up from about the 49th percentile in 2016–2017, a multi-year improvement rather than a one-year jump. All-grade MCAS proficiency is 42.86% in ELA, 50.76% in math, 37.54% in science, and 53.37% in civics; that is above the state in ELA, math, and civics, but below the state in science. Among Lowell middle schools, Daley is the clear leader and the only 4-star school in this group, ahead of Kathryn P. Stoklosa Middle School, B.F. Butler Middle School, Dr An Wang School, James Sullivan Middle School, and Henry J Robinson Middle. Compared with nearby districts, Daley is mixed against Marshall Middle School in Billerica and ahead of Justus C. Richardson Middle School in Dracut, but it generally trails McCarthy Middle School and Col Moses Parker School in Chelmsford, especially in ELA and science.
Grade-level results show a clear pattern: 5th grade is below the state in ELA, math, and science, while 6th-grade math (63.75%) and 8th-grade math (61.96%) are much stronger than the state, and 8th-grade science and civics are above state averages. The school’s subgroup results are mostly strong, with high effectiveness rankings for low-income students, homeless students, English learners, African American students, Hispanic students, and both female and male students; special education results are average and improving, while Asian students have a persistent lower effectiveness ranking that is the clearest equity area to investigate. Resources look moderate: $15,927 per student in 2020–2021 and a 13.2 student-teacher ratio in 2024–2025, with Daley spending less than Chelmsford and Marshall yet producing the best results in Lowell. Keep in mind that spending data is dated, free/reduced lunch data was unavailable, and these are proficiency rates, not growth measures.
Thank you for your feedback!