Summary
Emerson Elementary is a PK–5 school at 2421 E Johnson St on Madison’s east side, serving 297 students in the Madison Metropolitan School District. In 2025–2026, Emerson Elementary ranked 724 of 1,039 Wisconsin elementary schools—30th percentile, 2 stars—placing it slightly above its district average but below the state median. Its history shows a peak in 2018–2019 at the 59th percentile, followed by a decline and recent stability around the 30th–37th percentile. Locally, it outperforms nearby 1-star same-district schools such as Kennedy Elementary, Mendota Elementary, Schenk Elementary, Lake View Elementary, and Hawthorne Elementary, but trails Lowell Elementary (67th percentile, 3 stars), Marquette Elementary (80th percentile, 4 stars), and Winnequah School (79th percentile, 4 stars). Nuestro Mundo is close by rank (33rd percentile, 2 stars).
Academically, the picture is uneven. Science is the school’s brightest spot: 4th-grade science was 55.56%, above both district and state. Math is the clearest weakness, with every tested grade below district and state—41.67% in 3rd grade, 40.32% in 4th, and 38.24% in 5th. ELA is mixed, and 4th-grade social studies is also below district and state. Chronic absenteeism was 26.0% in 2024–2025, much improved from 42.1% in 2021–2022, and better than the district’s 29.6%, but still above Wisconsin’s 17.3%. The school spends $23,216 per student and has a 9.9:1 student-teacher ratio, both relatively favorable, though achievement remains middling; for comparison, Winnequah School spends $16,598 per student with an 11.8:1 ratio and ranks at the 79th percentile.
The school’s effectiveness rankings also vary widely by student group. Low-income students ranked at the 6th percentile (0 stars) in 2025–2026, down from 13th in 2024–2025 and 17th in 2023–2024—a major equity concern. Overall, the school has positive resource and attendance trends, a science strength, and persistent math and subgroup-effectiveness challenges. The key questions for parents and school leaders are why math lags across grades, why low-income subgroup rankings have fallen so sharply, and how the school’s relatively strong staffing and spending can be translated into stronger core academic outcomes.
Thank you for your feedback!