Summary
Richland Elementary is a PK-6 school in the Richardson Independent School District (Isd) serving 643 students, and it has experienced a significant and concerning academic decline over the past decade, dropping from the 68th percentile in 2015-2016 to the 27th percentile in 2025-2026. This downward trend is the school's most defining characteristic, especially when compared to nearby schools that have remained stable or improved. For instance, Richardson Heights Elementary ranks in the 71st percentile, Richardson Terrace Elementary is at the 77th percentile, and Jess Harben Elementary has climbed to the 78th percentile, all highlighting Richland's struggle to keep pace.
The most critical academic weakness is in mathematics, where proficiency rates are alarmingly low across all grades. In 6th grade math, only 26.56% of Richland students were proficient, compared to 50.29% in the district and a staggering 75% at Math/Science/Technical Magnet. Reading performance is inconsistent, with a bright spot in 3rd grade (56.1% proficient, above the state average) but a sharp drop in 4th and 6th grades, where proficiency falls well below state averages. This pattern suggests that early literacy gains are not being sustained as students progress, pointing to a potential breakdown in curriculum or support in the upper elementary grades.
Two other notable findings deserve attention. First, there is a stark gender gap: male students rank in the 19th percentile, while female students perform significantly better at the 37th percentile, indicating a need to investigate engagement and instructional strategies for boys. Second, support for special education students is volatile, swinging from the 72nd percentile one year to the 37th the next, which suggests inconsistent programming. Notably, the school's per-student spending and student-teacher ratio are comparable to higher-performing neighbors, indicating that resource allocation, not a lack of funds, is the key issue. The school's high-needs population (nearly 74% qualifying for free or reduced lunch) underscores the importance of targeted interventions to reverse this long-term decline.
Thank you for your feedback!