Summary
Ware Elementary in Longview, TX, serves 411 students in 1st through 5th grade within the Longview Independent School District (Isd), a district rated as average compared to others in Texas. The school has historically been low-performing but is showing a significant upward trend, reaching its highest state ranking in years (49th percentile) for the 2025-2026 school year, a notable improvement from a low of the 24th percentile in 2020-2021. Over 90% of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch, indicating a very high-needs population.
Ware Elementary stands out for its explosive growth in Mathematics, with 4th and 5th graders scoring 60.71% and 60.23% proficient in Math, respectively, in the 2025-2026 school year—above the state average and competitive with higher-performing schools like J L Everhart Magnet Elementary and Ned E Williams Elementary. This marks a dramatic turnaround from 2022-2023, when 4th grade Math proficiency was only 36%. However, the school shows a stark contrast in math instruction: 5th graders taking the Math STAAR in English scored 58.75% proficient, while those taking it in Spanish scored only 14.29% proficient, suggesting a significant achievement gap that needs attention. Reading scores across all grades consistently lag behind district and state averages, indicating that improvement strategies may be more effective in Math than in Reading.
An interesting comparison is with Hudson Elementary, a top-performing school just 2 miles away in the same district, which has only 52.65% of students on free/reduced lunch compared to Ware's 95%. This stark contrast highlights the profound impact of socioeconomic factors on school performance metrics. Ware Elementary spends $9,920 per student, less than other high-needs schools like Clarence W Bailey Elementary ($16,871) and Ned E Williams Elementary ($12,415), suggesting that while funding is important, resource allocation may need re-evaluation to improve Reading outcomes. Despite its challenges, Ware Elementary is a school on the rise, with strong subgroup performance for African American and low socio-economic status students, both earning 3-star ratings, which bodes well for its future.
Thank you for your feedback!