Summary
Lamar Elementary in Harlingen, TX, is a PK-5 school in the Harlingen Consolidated Independent School District that serves 401 students in a high-poverty area, with about 88.5% of students qualifying for free or reduced lunch. This school has undergone a remarkable turnaround, climbing from the 9th percentile statewide in 2021-2022 to the 43rd percentile in 2025-2026—a 34-percentile-point gain in just four years. While nearby schools like Zavala Elementary and Austin Elementary have stayed in the 40th-50th percentile range, Lamar has surged past them from a much lower starting point. In contrast, its closest neighbor, Jefferson Elementary (just 0.41 miles away), has been on a downward trend, falling from the 14th to the 27th percentile over the same period.
Lamar shows exceptional strength in supporting its most vulnerable students. Its special education students ranked in the 89th percentile statewide in 2023-2024, earning a 4-star rating—a standout achievement for a school with an overall 33rd percentile ranking that year. English Language Learners and low-income students consistently score in the 55th-66th percentile range (3-star), suggesting the school’s improvement strategies are working well for these groups. However, the school struggles significantly with its Gifted and Talented students, who ranked in the bottom 10% (9th percentile) in 2025-2026, and has historically underperformed with At-Risk students. This indicates a need for better enrichment programs for high-achievers.
Despite the overall progress, Lamar faces persistent academic challenges. While 3rd-grade Reading scores (61.29% proficient) exceed both district and state averages, 3rd-grade Math proficiency is just 30.65%—20 points below the district average and 14 points below the state. Science scores are also very low (19% in 5th grade), though this is a regional issue affecting most nearby schools except top-performing Bowie Elementary (78th percentile, 4-star). Interestingly, Lamar spends more per student ($11,138) than Bowie ($10,892) and has a lower student-teacher ratio (14.1:1 vs. 16.2:1), yet Bowie achieves far better results. This suggests that leadership and teaching quality—not just resources—are the key drivers of success, and Lamar’s future depends on learning from high-performing neighbors to address its math and science weaknesses.
Thank you for your feedback!