Summary
Caraway Elementary in Houston, TX, serves 553 students in grades 1 through 5 and is part of the Aldine Independent School District (Isd), where 89% of students qualify for free or reduced lunch. Despite higher per-student spending ($12,446) than some nearby Aldine schools, Caraway has consistently ranked in the bottom 2% of Texas elementary schools over the past six years, with its most recent rank at the 7th percentile. This persistent low performance makes it the lowest-performing school among its comparable peers in the district, such as Goodman Elementary (21st percentile) and Harris Elementary (24th percentile).
The most striking contrast is with Nitsch Elementary, located just 1.25 miles away in the Klein Independent School District (Isd). Both schools serve similar demographics (around 88% free/reduced lunch), yet Nitsch consistently ranks in the top 15% of Texas schools (89th percentile). For example, in 5th-grade Math, Caraway had a 22.78% proficiency rate, while Nitsch achieved 64.22%. This geographic paradox suggests that district-level policies, resource allocation, and leadership—not just student demographics—play a critical role in outcomes. Caraway's high spending relative to results raises questions about how funds are used, especially compared to schools like Smith Elementary ($10,889 per student) and Anderson Academy ($11,019 per student).
There are some hopeful signs in the most recent data. Caraway's overall rank improved from the 1st-2nd percentile to the 7th percentile, with notable gains for Male Students (from 1st to 15th percentile), African American Students (7th to 18th), and Low Socio-Economic Status Students (1st to 12th). Additionally, in the 2023-2024 school year, the school ranked in the 35th percentile for serving Special Education students—a significant outlier compared to its overall performance. However, academic outcomes remain inconsistent across grades and subjects; for instance, 4th-grade Math proficiency (39.25%) was nearly three times higher than 3rd-grade Math (13.24%), and Science proficiency has never exceeded 6.41%. This variability may point to uneven teaching quality or curriculum alignment challenges.
Thank you for your feedback!