Summary:
Sheridan, Texas, is home to a single school, Sheridan Elementary, a small K-5 campus within the Rice Consolidated Independent School District that serves just 82 students in a rural community. This school stands out for its extreme academic volatility, a common trait in very small schools where the performance of a handful of students can dramatically shift results from year to year. Despite serving a high-poverty population, with nearly 80% of students qualifying for free or reduced lunch, Sheridan Elementary has shown a clear upward trend in its state ranking, moving from the 39th percentile to the 57th percentile over three years, earning a 3-star rating.
The most remarkable finding is the "4th Grade Math Anomaly," where in the 2025-2026 school year, an extraordinary 90.91% of 4th graders were proficient in math, nearly doubling the state average of 49.28%. This suggests a particularly strong teacher or a highly motivated cohort of students in that specific grade and subject. Overall, the school demonstrates a relative strength in Mathematics compared to Reading, with recent math scores exceeding state averages in two out of three grades, while reading scores did so in only one. The school benefits from a very low student-teacher ratio of 11.5:1, which allows for significant individualized attention, a key asset for a school facing economic challenges.
However, the data also reveals extreme year-over-year swings, such as 3rd-grade math proficiency jumping from 80% to just 35.29% between school years, and 5th-grade math rising from 20% to 58.82%. This volatility is a classic sign of a small sample size, with only about 15-20 students per grade, making it difficult to identify stable long-term trends. For parents, this means that while Sheridan Elementary has proven it can achieve exceptional results, particularly in math, a single year's score should not be taken as a definitive measure of the school's overall quality. The improving state ranking and the potential for targeted instruction in a small setting are positive signs, but the data must be interpreted with the understanding that each year's cohort can produce very different outcomes.
Thank you for your feedback!