Summary
Lancaster Elementary is a PK–6 public school in Lancaster, MN, serving 122 students in a small rural community as part of the Lancaster Public School District. The district is ranked 354th of 458 Minnesota districts (23rd percentile, 1 star), while the school’s 2025–2026 rank is 602nd of 869 (31st percentile, 2 stars). Recent years show a mostly mid-to-lower pattern, including a stronger 2024–2025 at 53rd percentile and 3 stars, followed by a notable drop in 2025–2026. About 63.93% of students were eligible for free/reduced lunch in 2024–2025, and the student–teacher ratio was 14.8.
The nearest comparison in the data is Kittson Central Elementary, 8.37 miles away in Hallock, MN, also PK–6 with 139 students. Its district, Kittson Central School District, is ranked much higher at 127th of 458 (72nd percentile, 4 stars). In 2025–2026, the two schools were fairly close in overall rank: Lancaster 31st percentile vs. Kittson 36th. Proficiency rates show Lancaster at 35.6% in math, 44.1% in reading, and 22.2% in science, compared with Kittson’s 47.8%, 43.5%, and 11.1%, and state averages of 44.9%, 48.6%, and 25.5%. Lancaster trails Kittson in math, slightly leads in reading, and leads in science, but remains below the state average in all three subjects. Lancaster’s 4th grade reading (50%) is above the state’s 48.8%, and its 5th grade science (22.2%) beats Kittson’s 11.1% but is below the state’s 25.9%.
Overall, Lancaster outperforms its own district averages but lags statewide norms. After a strong 2024–2025, math fell from 51.56% to 35.6%, reading from 47.69% to 44.1%, and science from 26.67% to 22.2%. Science results have been especially volatile, likely because a single small grade is tested. A clear strength is the school’s low-SES subgroup, which ranked in the 88th–89th percentile in 2023–2024 and 2024–2025 and remained above median at the 51st percentile in 2025–2026 despite a high poverty rate. Lancaster also has a higher student–teacher ratio than Kittson (14.8 vs. 11.7). Families should weigh these positives against recent volatility and small cohort sizes, which can make year-to-year results swing.
Thank you for your feedback!