Chisholm Secondary

Public 7-12

 301 4th St SW
       Chisholm, MN  55719-1900


(218) 254-5726

District: Chisholm Public School District

SchoolDigger Rank:
217th of 492 Minnesota High Schools

Per Pupil Expenditures:  $14,250 Help

Student/teacher ratio:  13.7
Number of students:  318

Racial breakdown:

White:
89.6%
Two or more races:
4.7%
American Indian:
2.2%
more

Free/discounted lunch recipients:  38.1%

 See top rated Minnesota high schools

 Compare Chisholm Secondary to nearby high schools!
Due to the disruption caused by COVID-19, the Minnesota Department of Education did not administer assessments for the 2019-2020 school year. SchoolDigger will resume updating its rankings when test scores are released in 2021.


Performance Trends
Help
Compare Details Chisholm Secondary ranks worse than 72.4% of middle schools in Minnesota. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2019 the calculated Average Standard Score was 32.33. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details Chisholm Secondary ranks better than 55.9% of high schools in Minnesota. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2019 the calculated Average Standard Score was 60.72. (See more...)
Student Body
Help
Compare Details Racial makeup is: White (89.6%), two or more races (4.7%), American Indian (2.2%). (See more...)
Help
Compare Details 38.1% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. (See more...)
Teachers
Help
Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at Chisholm Secondary is 13.7. (See more...)
Help
Compare Chisholm Secondary employs 23 full-time teachers.
Finance
Help
Compare Details The average total spent per student at Chisholm Secondary is $14,250.
Map and boundary of Chisholm Secondary
Schooldigger 2019 Rankings:

Chisholm Secondary:

SchoolDigger ranks Chisholm Secondary 386th of 533 Minnesota public middle schools. (See Chisholm Secondary in the ranking list.)
SchoolDigger ranks Chisholm Secondary 217th of 492 Minnesota public high schools. (See Chisholm Secondary in the ranking list.)



What do you think?

Your rating for Chisholm Secondary?

Rank History for Chisholm Secondary

Help
Compare
Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools MN State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2004 34.08 309th 387 20.2%
2005 33.57 316th 396 20.2%
2006 46.01 268th 406 34.0%
2007 31.56 329th 403 18.4%
2008 31.13 336th 409 17.8%
2010 40.45 321st 454 29.3%
2011 32.82 370th 478 22.6%
2012 25.08 395th 469 15.8%
2013 33.04 363rd 488 25.6%
2014 20.38 415th 490 15.3%
2015 36.49 354th 516 31.4%
2016 34.50 366th 508 28.0%
2017 43.72 321st 523 38.6%
2018 32.82 376th 518 27.4%
2019 32.33 386th 533 27.6%

Data source: test scores: Minnesota Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

Rank History for Chisholm Secondary

Help
Compare
Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools MN State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2004 68.02 188th 433 56.6%
2005 59.08 280th 452 38.1%
2006 61.18 218th 450 51.6%
2007 66.05 182nd 463 60.7%
2008 70.53 162nd 460 64.8%
2010 49.95 336th 540 37.8%
2011 62.31 249th 545 54.3%
2012 53.61 321st 539 40.4%
2013 57.45 273rd 534 48.9%
2014 39.17 340th 483 29.6%
2015 61.91 217th 504 56.9%
2016 25.84 374th 489 23.5%
2017 33.03 359th 489 26.6%
2018 54.31 268th 494 45.7%
2019 60.72 217th 492 55.9%

Data source: test scores: Minnesota Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

Chisholm Secondary Test Scores
Tests: 
  
Grades: 
  
Years: 
  
Group by: 
  
District Scores: 
  
State Scores: 







Data source: Minnesota Department of Education

We're sorry, but no reviews have been submitted for Chisholm Secondary.

If you have first-hand knowledge about Chisholm Secondary, submit a rating!


No reviews have been submitted!


Enrollment information for Chisholm Secondary

Help
Compare
Year White African American Asian Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Not Specified Total
1988 355 3 1 0 11 n/a n/a 0 370
1989 336 1 2 1 13 n/a n/a 0 353
1990 300 0 4 0 8 n/a n/a 0 312
1991 318 0 4 0 4 n/a n/a 0 326
1993 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 342 342
1994 330 1 6 0 9 n/a n/a 0 346
1995 318 1 5 0 6 n/a n/a 0 330
1996 318 1 5 0 6 n/a n/a 0 330
1997 317 2 3 0 7 n/a n/a 0 329
1998 333 1 2 0 6 n/a n/a 0 342
1999 360 1 1 1 5 n/a n/a 0 368
2000 338 0 4 2 5 n/a n/a 0 349
2001 445 0 6 1 8 n/a n/a 0 460
2002 369 0 5 1 8 n/a n/a 0 383
2003 369 0 5 1 8 n/a n/a 0 383
2004 343 0 3 0 12 n/a n/a 0 358
2005 340 0 4 1 10 n/a n/a 0 355
2006 331 0 3 0 10 n/a n/a 0 344
2007 317 1 3 0 7 n/a n/a 0 328
2008 319 2 4 0 7 n/a n/a 0 332
2009 309 4 3 0 7 n/a n/a 0 323
2010 291 4 4 1 6 n/a n/a 0 306
2011 265 3 1 3 6 1 0 0 279
2012 272 4 1 1 3 1 0 0 282
2013 291 3 1 2 4 1 3 0 305
2014 274 3 1 3 6 2 7 0 296
2015 298 4 1 3 6 0 7 0 319
2016 307 4 1 3 3 1 10 0 329
2017 309 6 2 5 5 0 17 0 344
2018 294 6 2 8 7 0 15 0 332
2019 285 6 0 5 7 0 15 0 318

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity
For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Chisholm Secondary

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1988 370 21.9 16.8 14.6
1989 353 19.9 17.7 13.3
1990 312 16.6 18.7 9.3
1991 326 21.0 15.5 7.7
1993 342 0.0 0.0 0
1994 346 14.4 24.0 11
1995 330 15.8 20.9 6.1
1996 330 15.8 20.9 6.1
1997 329 13.4 24.6 7.3
1998 342 n/a 0.0 7.6
1999 368 18.3 20.1 11.7
2000 349 11.8 29.6 10.6
2001 460 12.6 36.5 15
2002 383 21.4 17.9 18
2003 383 21.4 17.9 18
2004 358 20.1 17.8 22.3
2005 355 19.6 18.1 25.9
2006 344 19.6 17.6 27.3
2007 328 19.8 16.6 29.6
2008 332 20.5 16.2 34.9
2009 323 20.5 15.8 33.1
2010 306 20.9 14.6 36.6
2011 279 18.7 14.8 34.4
2012 282 19.4 14.4 31.2
2013 305 20.8 14.6 35.7
2014 296 20.8 14.2 32.4
2015 319 23.0 13.8 38.6
2016 329 24.0 13.7 45
2017 344 23.8 14.4 43.6
2018 332 22.7 14.5 47.9
2019 318 23.0 13.7 38.1

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch
For information about the National School Lunch Program, see the USDA Website

Student/Teacher Ratio Chisholm Secondary

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1988 370 21.9 16.8 14.6
1989 353 19.9 17.7 13.3
1990 312 16.6 18.7 9.3
1991 326 21.0 15.5 7.7
1993 342 0.0 0.0 0
1994 346 14.4 24.0 11
1995 330 15.8 20.9 6.1
1996 330 15.8 20.9 6.1
1997 329 13.4 24.6 7.3
1998 342 n/a 0.0 7.6
1999 368 18.3 20.1 11.7
2000 349 11.8 29.6 10.6
2001 460 12.6 36.5 15
2002 383 21.4 17.9 18
2003 383 21.4 17.9 18
2004 358 20.1 17.8 22.3
2005 355 19.6 18.1 25.9
2006 344 19.6 17.6 27.3
2007 328 19.8 16.6 29.6
2008 332 20.5 16.2 34.9
2009 323 20.5 15.8 33.1
2010 306 20.9 14.6 36.6
2011 279 18.7 14.8 34.4
2012 282 19.4 14.4 31.2
2013 305 20.8 14.6 35.7
2014 296 20.8 14.2 32.4
2015 319 23.0 13.8 38.6
2016 329 24.0 13.7 45
2017 344 23.8 14.4 43.6
2018 332 22.7 14.5 47.9
2019 318 23.0 13.7 38.1

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio
Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.
Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for Chisholm Secondary

Help

'
YearTotal Expenditures Per Pupil
2019 $14,250

Data source: Minnesota Department of Education




Rate Chisholm Secondary!



Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Chisholm Secondary!




SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the Minnesota Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that school and district boundary data are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.





Diagnostics