Beta You're viewing our redesigned school page. Prefer the classic layout?

Chisholm Secondary

Public Grades 7-12
360th
SchoolDigger Rank ?
of 473 Minnesota High Schools
Better than 24% of Minnesota high schools
Summary

Chisholm Secondary is a grades 7–12 school in Chisholm, Minnesota, in St. Louis County’s Iron Range, serving 291 students as the only secondary campus in the Chisholm Public School District. On SchoolDigger’s 2025-26 rankings it sits at the 24th percentile among Minnesota secondary schools, with 1 star, after two years of slipping back toward its 2015-16 and 2016-17 levels; the school has spent most of the past decade in the bottom third statewide, with a high-water mark of the 56th percentile in 2018-19 and a recent best of the 40th in 2023-24.

Academically, Chisholm’s 2025-26 MCA proficiency is at the bottom of its regional peer group: 11.7% in math, 18.4% in reading, and 13.7% in science, below every other comprehensive high school in the comparison set. The gaps are especially large in the middle grades, such as 6.7% in 8th grade math, 9.6% in 7th grade reading, and 4.7% in 8th grade science. For comparison, Hibbing High posts 37.9% math and 41.0% reading, Mountain Iron-Buhl Secondary reaches 43.5% reading, and Nashwauk Secondary—with nearly identical free/reduced-lunch demographics—posts 33.7% math and 34.3% reading. Math and science have declined two years in a row, and reading fell sharply to 18.4% in 2025-26 after reaching 36.2% the year before. One bright spot: the high school End-of-Course science result is 26.7%, only about 8 points below the state.

Graduation tells a split story: Chisholm’s 83.6% graduation rate is essentially at the state average and close to Hibbing High, but its 8.1% dropout rate is nearly double the state’s 4.2% and higher than most comprehensive peers. The 2024-25 free/reduced-lunch share is 51.55%, up for the third year, while the student-teacher ratio is a favorable 13.6. Notably, the Chisholm Public School District’s overall proficiency is higher than the secondary school’s, suggesting the elementary grades are outperforming grades 7–12. The most encouraging signs are that elementary performance, the strong End-of-Course science result, and the 2021-22 year when graduation was 90.2% and dropout was 2.4%; the challenge is making that level consistent as students move through middle and high school.

291
Students ?
13.6
Student/teacher ratio ?
$14,250
Per pupil spending ?
51.5%
Free/reduced lunch eligible (2024-25) ?
All students in Minnesota receive free school meals.
 301 4th St SW
       Chisholm, MN  55719-1900

(218) 254-5726

District: Chisholm Public School District


Feeder schools for Chisholm Secondary:

Elementary:    Vaughan-Steffensrud Elementary
Middle:    Chisholm Elementary
Racial breakdown:

White:
89.3%
Hispanic:
3.1%
Two or more races:
3.1%
more
 See top rated Minnesota high schools

 Compare Chisholm Secondary to nearby high schools!
At a glance
▬ Ranking trend: Holding steady — 24th percentile in 2016 → 24th in 2026
Worth a look
!Test scores below the Minnesota average (14% vs 43% meeting standards)
!In the lower quartile statewide (24th percentile)
!Dropout rate above the Minnesota average (8% vs 4%)
Students meeting standards (2025-2026) ?
This school14%
District avg27%
Minnesota avg43%
Middle school
498th of 546
Minnesota public middle schools ?
Bottom 9%▼ down 19 pts since 2016
From bottom 28% (2016) to bottom 9% (2026)
See the entire ranking list of Minnesota Middle Schools →
★★★★★
SchoolDigger rating ?
High school
360th of 473
Minnesota public high schools ?
Bottom 24%▬ steady since 2016
See the entire ranking list of Minnesota High Schools →
★★★★★
SchoolDigger rating ?
Statewide rank percentile over time (100 = the top-ranked school in the state; click a legend item to add a student group)
Middle school ranking
Show full rank history (all student groups)

All Students

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202610.9498 of 5468.8%☆☆☆☆☆
202528.3398 of 51923.3%★☆☆☆☆
202425.9427 of 54521.7%★☆☆☆☆
202324.0416 of 52921.4%★☆☆☆☆
202225.1400 of 52023.1%★☆☆☆☆
202140.8313 of 52139.9%★★☆☆☆
201932.3386 of 53327.6%★☆☆☆☆
201832.8376 of 51827.4%★☆☆☆☆
201743.7321 of 52338.6%★★☆☆☆
201634.5366 of 50828.0%★☆☆☆☆
201536.5354 of 51631.4%★★☆☆☆
201420.4415 of 49015.3%★☆☆☆☆
201333.0363 of 48825.6%★☆☆☆☆
201225.1395 of 46915.8%★☆☆☆☆
201132.8370 of 47822.6%★☆☆☆☆
201040.4321 of 45429.3%★☆☆☆☆
200831.1336 of 40917.8%★☆☆☆☆
200731.6329 of 40318.4%★☆☆☆☆
200646.0268 of 40634.0%★★☆☆☆
200533.6316 of 39620.2%★☆☆☆☆
200434.1309 of 38720.2%★☆☆☆☆

Female

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202610.6426 of 4678.8%☆☆☆☆☆
202528.7337 of 45025.1%★☆☆☆☆
202419.9400 of 47415.6%★☆☆☆☆
202317.2392 of 45513.8%★☆☆☆☆
202216.6400 of 46714.3%★☆☆☆☆
202121.6370 of 44316.5%★☆☆☆☆
201919.1380 of 43913.4%★☆☆☆☆
201836.3310 of 43628.9%★☆☆☆☆

Low Socio Economic Status

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
20267.7453 of 4581.1%☆☆☆☆☆
202524.5353 of 43218.3%★☆☆☆☆
202435.3324 of 47331.5%★★☆☆☆
202325.4358 of 45922.0%★☆☆☆☆
202228.3314 of 40422.3%★☆☆☆☆
202157.9134 of 39966.4%★★★☆☆
201942.5257 of 41538.1%★★☆☆☆
201842.4258 of 40135.7%★★☆☆☆

Male

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
20269.7456 of 4835.6%☆☆☆☆☆
202523.7364 of 45219.5%★☆☆☆☆
202431.2345 of 47928.0%★☆☆☆☆
202331.6322 of 46430.6%★★☆☆☆
202232.3335 of 47629.6%★★☆☆☆
202156.1181 of 43758.6%★★★☆☆
201942.5281 of 45438.1%★★☆☆☆
201825.2355 of 43818.9%★☆☆☆☆

Special Education

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202325.5241 of 29819.1%★☆☆☆☆
201924.7230 of 28218.4%★☆☆☆☆

White

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
20264.5423 of 4352.8%☆☆☆☆☆
202515.7384 of 4157.5%☆☆☆☆☆
202413.9409 of 4407.0%☆☆☆☆☆
20239.6419 of 4363.9%☆☆☆☆☆
202210.8417 of 4384.8%☆☆☆☆☆
202126.5333 of 42221.1%★☆☆☆☆
201914.6398 of 4287.0%☆☆☆☆☆
201816.6383 of 42810.5%★☆☆☆☆
High school ranking
Show full rank history (all student groups)

All Students

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202627.0360 of 47323.9%★☆☆☆☆
202526.1354 of 45021.3%★☆☆☆☆
202445.0287 of 48040.2%★★☆☆☆
202335.0336 of 47629.4%★☆☆☆☆
202241.1307 of 47235.0%★★☆☆☆
202133.8321 of 42825.0%★☆☆☆☆
201960.7217 of 49255.9%★★★☆☆
201854.3268 of 49445.7%★★☆☆☆
201733.0359 of 48926.6%★☆☆☆☆
201625.8374 of 48923.5%★☆☆☆☆
201561.9217 of 50456.9%★★★☆☆
201439.2340 of 48329.6%★☆☆☆☆
201357.4273 of 53448.9%★★☆☆☆
201253.6321 of 53940.4%★★☆☆☆
201162.3249 of 54554.3%★★★☆☆
201050.0336 of 54037.8%★★☆☆☆
200870.5162 of 46064.8%★★★☆☆
200766.0182 of 46360.7%★★★☆☆
200661.2218 of 45051.6%★★★☆☆
200559.1280 of 45238.1%★★☆☆☆
200468.0188 of 43356.6%★★★☆☆

Female

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202618.7333 of 39816.3%★☆☆☆☆
202519.7299 of 35816.5%★☆☆☆☆
202422.4326 of 40319.1%★☆☆☆☆
202314.5357 of 3969.8%★☆☆☆☆
202224.8319 of 38817.8%★☆☆☆☆
202138.2241 of 33928.9%★☆☆☆☆
201935.0295 of 40126.4%★☆☆☆☆
201836.6293 of 39525.8%★☆☆☆☆

Low Socio Economic Status

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202513.8309 of 3337.2%☆☆☆☆☆
202453.3187 of 38951.9%★★★☆☆
202344.3227 of 39342.2%★★☆☆☆
202253.7142 of 31254.5%★★★☆☆
202145.2154 of 27043.0%★★☆☆☆
201958.4151 of 37059.2%★★★☆☆
201871.783 of 37477.8%★★★★☆

Male

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202521.7319 of 37715.4%★☆☆☆☆
202455.8187 of 40553.8%★★★☆☆
202344.2239 of 39839.9%★★☆☆☆
202247.5227 of 40343.7%★★☆☆☆
202118.0311 of 35111.4%★☆☆☆☆
201974.876 of 41181.5%★★★★☆
201860.0177 of 39855.5%★★★☆☆

Special Education

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
202218.3194 of 2149.3%☆☆☆☆☆

White

YearAvg scoreStatewide rankMinnesota percentileRating
20269.1369 of 3946.3%☆☆☆☆☆
202510.4352 of 3766.4%☆☆☆☆☆
202431.8307 of 40223.6%★☆☆☆☆
202324.8333 of 39816.3%★☆☆☆☆
202225.6334 of 40116.7%★☆☆☆☆
202121.9323 of 36411.3%★☆☆☆☆
201955.3204 of 41250.5%★★★☆☆
201839.8298 of 41428.0%★☆☆☆☆
How student groups rank statewide ? (each group's percentile vs the same group at other schools — higher is better; the +/- beside each compares the group with this school's overall percentile)
Middle school
Special Education (2023)19th percentile~ school
Female (2026)9th percentile~ school
Male (2026)6th percentile-3 vs school
White (2026)3rd percentile-6 vs school
Low Socio Economic Status (2026)1st percentile-8 vs school
High school
Female (2026)16th percentile-8 vs school
Male (2025)15th percentile-6 vs school
Special Education (2022)9th percentile-26 vs school
Low Socio Economic Status (2025)7th percentile-14 vs school
White (2026)6th percentile-18 vs school
By subject vs Minnesota (2025-2026) ?
Reading18%-30 vs state
Science14%-12 vs state
Math12%-33 vs state

★
No ratings yet
Be the first to rate Chisholm Secondary and help other families decide.
Rate Chisholm Secondary
Have first-hand experience? A quick rating - and a sentence or two about what stands out (teachers, academics, safety, communication) - helps other families know what to expect.
Takes about a minute. We email you a link to verify your review - your address is never shown publicly.
Tap a star to rate
Reviews
No written reviews yet. If you know this school, be the first to share what stands out.



Schools Near Chisholm Secondary

Ranking:
Map legend
E Elementary M Middle H High A Alternative P Private






Frequently Asked Questions about Chisholm Secondary

Students at Chisholm Secondary are 89% White, 3% Hispanic, 3% Two or more races, 2% American Indian, 2% African American.

Chisholm Secondary ranks in the bottom 23.9% of Minnesota high schools.

Chisholm Secondary is fed by the following schools:

Elementary : Vaughan-Steffensrud Elementary
Middle : Chisholm Elementary

In the 2024-25 school year, 291 students attended Chisholm Secondary.

Rate Chisholm Secondary!



Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Chisholm Secondary!


Latest Minnesota data All new data »
2022–23 dropout ratesNewNov 13, 2026
2019–20 through 2025–26 immunization rates (updated)Oct 19, 2026
2024–25 through 2025–26 MCA-III & MCA-IV test scoresSep 30, 2026
2024–25 dropout rates & graduation ratesJun 13, 2026


SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the Minnesota Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.

Diagnostics