Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P

Public 10-12

 1353 W Hwy 10
       Anoka, MN  55303-1564


(763) 433-4000

District: Anoka-Hennepin School District

Per Pupil Expenditures:  $19,095 Help


Student/teacher ratio:  0.8 Help
Number of students:  19

Racial breakdown:

White:
57.9%
Asian:
21.1%
African American:
15.8%
more

Free/discounted lunch recipients:  52.6% Help


 See top rated Minnesota public schools

 Compare Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P to nearby high schools!

Performance Trends
Help
Compare Details Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P is not ranked due for the most recent year due to insufficient test score data. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2019 the calculated Average Standard Score was 13.02. (See more...)
Help
The Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate (ACGR) measures the percentage of Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P freshmen who graduate within four years, adjusting for students who transfer in or out.
Help
The high school dropout rate measures the percentage of students who do not complete their high school education.
Student Body
Help
Compare Details Student population at Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P is diverse. Racial makeup is: White (57.9%), Asian (21.1%), African American (15.8%). (See more...)
Help
Compare Details 52.6% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. (See more...)
Teachers
Help
Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P is 0.8, which is the 3rd best among 7 high schools in the Anoka-Hennepin School District. (See more...)
Help
Compare Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P employs 21.5 full-time teachers.
Finance
Help
Compare Details The average total spent per student at Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P is $19,095, which is the 4th highest among 7 high schools in the Anoka-Hennepin School District.
Schooldigger Rankings:

Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P was not ranked this year due to insufficient test score data.

Anoka-Hennepin School District:

SchoolDigger ranks Anoka-Hennepin School District 165th of 448 Minnesota school districts. (See district ranking list.)


What do you think?

Your rating for Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P?

Rank History for Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P

Help
Compare

Rank History for all students at Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools MN State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2011 30.82 386th 545 29.2%
2012 22.78 398th 539 26.2%
2013 33.27 377th 534 29.4%
2014 31.71 366th 483 24.2%
2015 11.40 425th 504 15.7%
2016 12.75 405th 489 17.2%
2017 43.59 330th 489 32.5%
2018 34.32 363rd 494 26.5%
2019 13.02 415th 492 15.7%
See the entire list of Minnesota High School Rankings!

Rank History for Female students at Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools MN State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2019 5.66 374th 401 6.7%
See the entire list of Best Minnesota High Schools for Female Students!

Rank History for Male students at Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools MN State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 30.88 317th 398 20.4%
2019 15.21 364th 411 11.4%
See the entire list of Best Minnesota High Schools for Male Students!

Rank History for White students at Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools MN State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 16.67 365th 414 11.8%
2019 5.51 384th 412 6.8%
See the entire list of Best Minnesota High Schools for White Students!

Data source: test scores: Minnesota Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.

Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.

Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P Test Scores
Tests: 
  
Grades: 
  
Years: 
  
Group by: 
District Scores:
State Scores:    
  
Subgroup: 




Data source: Minnesota Department of Education

We're sorry, but no reviews have been submitted for Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P.

If you have first-hand knowledge about Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P, submit a rating!



No reviews have been submitted!


Enrollment information for Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P

Help
Compare
Year White African American Asian Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Not Specified Total
2004 1 0 0 0 0 n/a n/a 0 1
2005 7 0 0 0 0 n/a n/a 0 7
2006 5 0 0 0 0 n/a n/a 0 5
2007 1 0 0 0 0 n/a n/a 0 1
2008 1 0 0 0 0 n/a n/a 0 1
2009 4 0 1 0 0 n/a n/a 0 5
2010 8 0 1 0 0 n/a n/a 0 9
2011 157 8 4 3 1 0 1 0 174
2012 135 10 0 7 1 0 2 0 155
2013 145 6 9 8 4 0 2 0 174
2014 145 9 4 2 1 0 5 0 166
2015 94 8 1 6 1 0 3 0 113
2016 86 5 4 3 0 0 2 0 100
2017 84 5 0 2 1 1 4 0 97
2018 123 24 5 10 4 0 10 0 176
2019 138 27 12 14 2 0 2 0 195
2020 96 29 5 10 1 0 7 0 148
2021 41 4 5 4 0 0 5 0 59
2022 22 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 28
2023 11 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 19

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
2004 1 19.4 0.1 n/a
2005 7 23.7 0.3 0
2006 5 23.0 0.2 0
2007 1 18.4 0.1 0
2008 1 16.6 0.1 0
2009 5 21.4 0.2 n/a
2010 9 29.4 0.3 0
2011 174 25.8 6.7 20.1
2012 155 28.4 5.4 23.2
2013 174 27.2 6.3 21.8
2014 166 26.8 6.1 22.9
2015 113 24.0 4.7 27.4
2016 100 22.0 4.5 28
2017 97 22.5 4.3 39.2
2018 176 22.6 7.7 35.8
2019 195 25.0 7.8 34.4
2020 148 22.6 6.5 40.5
2021 59 21.0 2.7 27.1
2022 28 33.8 0.8 21.4
2023 19 21.5 0.8 52.6

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
2004 1 19.4 0.1 n/a
2005 7 23.7 0.3 0
2006 5 23.0 0.2 0
2007 1 18.4 0.1 0
2008 1 16.6 0.1 0
2009 5 21.4 0.2 n/a
2010 9 29.4 0.3 0
2011 174 25.8 6.7 20.1
2012 155 28.4 5.4 23.2
2013 174 27.2 6.3 21.8
2014 166 26.8 6.1 22.9
2015 113 24.0 4.7 27.4
2016 100 22.0 4.5 28
2017 97 22.5 4.3 39.2
2018 176 22.6 7.7 35.8
2019 195 25.0 7.8 34.4
2020 148 22.6 6.5 40.5
2021 59 21.0 2.7 27.1
2022 28 33.8 0.8 21.4
2023 19 21.5 0.8 52.6

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.
Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P

Help

YearTotal Expenditures Per Pupil
2019 $19,095

Data source: Minnesota Department of Education
Pre and Post Pandemic Data

Impact of COVID-19 on Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P

The coronavirus has had a profound impact on education in America. Learning shifted online overnight, attendance numbers dwindled, and enrollment decreased. SchoolDigger.com is making it easier for you to better assess how COVID-19 has impacted your school. Through the collection of pre-pandemic (2019) and current data, SchoolDigger.com is sharing test scores, enrollment numbers and school demographics from schools across the country – and we make it easy to see how impacted schools compare locally and statewide.

Student Body

Number of students
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Number of students
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Total Students19519
 90.3%
African American273
 88.9%
American Indian20
 100%
Asian124
 66.7%
Hispanic141
 92.9%
Pacific Islander00
White13811
 92%
Two or More Races20
 100%
% Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients34.4%52.6%
 18.3%


Schools Near Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P









Frequently Asked Questions about Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P

Students at Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P are 58% White, 21% Asian, 16% African American, 5% Hispanic.

In the 2022-23 school year, 19 students attended Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P.


Rate Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P!



Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Secondary Technical Educational Prog S.T.E.P!




SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the Minnesota Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.





Diagnostics

None retrieved from Database in 33 milliseconds.