E. L. Musick Elementary

Public

 5735 Musick Ave.
       Newark, CA  94560-2554


(510) 818-4000

District: Newark Unified


Student/teacher ratio:  19.5 Help
Number of students:  176

Racial breakdown:

Hispanic:
56.3%
Asian:
27.3%
Two or more races:
9.7%
more

Free/discounted lunch recipients:  57.4% Help


 See top rated California public schools

 Compare E. L. Musick Elementary to nearby schools!

Performance Trends
Help
Compare Details E. L. Musick Elementary is not ranked due for the most recent year due to insufficient test score data. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2022 the calculated Average Standard Score was 57.79. (See more...)
Help
Chronic absenteeism in a high school refers to a situation where students repeatedly miss school, with the threshold often defined as missing 10% or more of school days for any reason, excused or unexcused.
Finance
Schooldigger Rankings:

E. L. Musick Elementary was not ranked this year due to insufficient test score data.

Newark Unified:

SchoolDigger ranks Newark Unified 762nd of 1560 California school districts. (See district ranking list.)


What do you think?

Your rating for E. L. Musick Elementary?

Rank History for E. L. Musick Elementary

Help
Compare

Rank History for all students at E. L. Musick Elementary

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2004 38.37 2723rd 4809 43.4%
2005 33.99 3054th 4822 36.7%
2006 29.68 3320th 4818 31.1%
2007 22.22 4115th 5113 19.5%
2008 26.61 3855th 5113 24.6%
2009 33.20 3493rd 5193 32.7%
2010 27.87 4015th 5314 24.4%
2011 43.34 2999th 5377 44.2%
2012 44.67 2968th 5390 44.9%
2013 53.51 2475th 5530 55.2%
2015 42.66 2871st 5611 48.8%
2016 43.62 2852nd 5614 49.2%
2017 42.73 2934th 5692 48.5%
2018 34.65 3495th 5662 38.3%
2019 37.27 3370th 5789 41.8%
2022 57.79 2132nd 5883 63.8%
See the entire list of California School Rankings!

Rank History for English Language Learner students at E. L. Musick Elementary

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 47.32 1373rd 3246 57.7%
2019 42.22 1658th 3275 49.4%
2022 82.21 267th 3311 91.9%
See the entire list of Best California Schools for English Language Learner Students!

Rank History for Low Socio Economic Status students at E. L. Musick Elementary

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 37.62 3194th 5084 37.2%
2019 38.02 3270th 5173 36.8%
2022 56.76 1878th 5264 64.3%
See the entire list of Best California Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!

Rank History for Female students at E. L. Musick Elementary

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 45.85 2731st 5413 49.5%
2019 43.39 2901st 5492 47.2%
2022 47.51 2549th 5635 54.8%
See the entire list of Best California Schools for Female Students!

Rank History for Male students at E. L. Musick Elementary

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 24.52 4147th 5431 23.6%
2019 25.43 4149th 5510 24.7%
See the entire list of Best California Schools for Male Students!

Rank History for Hispanic students at E. L. Musick Elementary

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 29.09 3614th 4830 25.2%
2019 39.14 3013th 4963 39.3%
2022 56.84 1788th 5084 64.8%
See the entire list of Best California Schools for Hispanic Students!

Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.

Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.

E. L. Musick Elementary Test Scores
Tests: 
  
Grades: 
  
Years: 
  
Group by: 
District Scores:
State Scores:    
  
Subgroup: 







Data source: California Department of Education

Review counts

All ratings (Avg rating: 4)
0%

100%

0%

0%

0%

  

Reviews:
by a parent
Sunday, May 27, 2018

Open Quote My daughter is now a 5th grader and we have no complaints. Her test scores are above average and she comes home eager to share what she has learned at school. Many evaluate our school by its test scores and compare it with other local schools. The demographics are different and should be taken into account. Musick has a large population of English learners who come from families who don't speak English. When you compare those students to fluent English speakers, their test scores will obviously be lower. I see the dedication and commitment of the teachers on a daily basis. As an active parent in the school community, I also see the improvement of our students to advance toward proficiency. Close Quote



Enrollment information for E. L. Musick Elementary

Help
Compare
Year White African American Asian Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Not Specified Total
1988 297 18 50 128 1 n/a n/a 0 494
1989 297 18 59 123 1 n/a n/a 0 498
1990 331 29 66 110 1 n/a n/a 0 537
1991 351 30 75 103 1 n/a n/a 0 560
1992 348 35 75 110 0 n/a n/a 0 568
1993 316 30 80 142 3 n/a n/a 0 571
1994 288 41 75 169 4 n/a n/a 0 577
1995 229 39 96 169 4 n/a n/a 0 537
1996 229 39 96 169 4 n/a n/a 0 537
1997 210 38 115 183 3 n/a n/a 0 549
1998 200 39 104 189 7 n/a n/a 0 539
1999 179 38 110 195 6 n/a n/a 1 529
2000 143 31 113 205 4 n/a n/a 0 496
2001 118 25 127 208 2 n/a n/a 0 480
2002 92 15 134 208 1 n/a n/a 0 450
2003 92 15 134 208 1 n/a n/a 0 450
2004 82 21 115 236 2 n/a n/a 9 465
2005 75 24 104 269 3 n/a n/a 9 484
2006 60 31 84 266 2 n/a n/a 7 450
2007 54 29 83 287 1 n/a n/a 14 468
2008 38 23 80 276 n/a n/a n/a 0 417
2009 45 21 63 263 0 12 28 0 432
2010 33 18 50 252 1 16 7 0 377
2011 25 13 54 214 1 13 11 0 331
2012 24 9 52 215 0 9 10 0 319
2013 21 13 59 225 1 10 13 0 342
2014 17 9 47 204 0 11 12 0 300
2015 30 11 52 207 0 10 9 0 319
2016 28 11 57 185 0 7 11 0 299
2017 21 10 51 183 0 7 13 0 285
2018 28 9 58 184 0 7 9 0 295
2019 25 5 63 175 0 8 7 0 283
2020 29 4 65 160 0 5 11 0 274
2021 26 3 62 158 0 5 18 0 272
2022 8 2 48 99 0 2 17 0 176

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at E. L. Musick Elementary

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1988 494 18.0 27.4 n/a
1989 498 20.2 24.6 n/a
1990 537 20.7 25.9 n/a
1991 560 23.2 24.1 n/a
1992 568 23.6 24.0 21.5
1993 571 21.4 26.7 34.9
1994 577 24.6 23.5 28.8
1995 537 25.0 21.5 33.5
1996 537 25.0 21.5 33.5
1997 549 26.5 20.7 37
1998 539 30.5 17.7 37.1
1999 529 29.8 17.8 35.6
2000 496 28.8 17.2 34.3
2001 480 28.0 17.1 29.8
2002 450 26.0 17.3 35.3
2003 450 26.0 17.3 35.3
2004 465 23.0 20.2 6.1
2005 484 24.0 20.2 49.5
2006 450 24.2 18.6 47.9
2007 468 24.0 19.5 60.6
2008 417 26.0 16.0 58.5
2009 432 24.0 17.3 64.4
2010 377 15.0 25.1 67.1
2011 331 n/a n/a 63.7
2012 319 14.3 22.2 99.1
2013 342 15.6 21.8 67
2014 300 12.0 25.0 65
2015 319 13.0 24.5 63.3
2016 299 13.0 23.0 65.6
2017 285 11.0 25.9 64.9
2018 295 9.0 32.7 64.7
2019 283 9.0 31.4 62.2
2020 274 n/a n/a 55.8
2021 272 13.0 20.9 67.3
2022 176 9.0 19.5 57.4

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio E. L. Musick Elementary

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1988 494 18.0 27.4 n/a
1989 498 20.2 24.6 n/a
1990 537 20.7 25.9 n/a
1991 560 23.2 24.1 n/a
1992 568 23.6 24.0 21.5
1993 571 21.4 26.7 34.9
1994 577 24.6 23.5 28.8
1995 537 25.0 21.5 33.5
1996 537 25.0 21.5 33.5
1997 549 26.5 20.7 37
1998 539 30.5 17.7 37.1
1999 529 29.8 17.8 35.6
2000 496 28.8 17.2 34.3
2001 480 28.0 17.1 29.8
2002 450 26.0 17.3 35.3
2003 450 26.0 17.3 35.3
2004 465 23.0 20.2 6.1
2005 484 24.0 20.2 49.5
2006 450 24.2 18.6 47.9
2007 468 24.0 19.5 60.6
2008 417 26.0 16.0 58.5
2009 432 24.0 17.3 64.4
2010 377 15.0 25.1 67.1
2011 331 n/a n/a 63.7
2012 319 14.3 22.2 99.1
2013 342 15.6 21.8 67
2014 300 12.0 25.0 65
2015 319 13.0 24.5 63.3
2016 299 13.0 23.0 65.6
2017 285 11.0 25.9 64.9
2018 295 9.0 32.7 64.7
2019 283 9.0 31.4 62.2
2020 274 n/a n/a 55.8
2021 272 13.0 20.9 67.3
2022 176 9.0 19.5 57.4

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.

Kindergarten Immunization Rates

E. L. Musick Elementary

Help
Compare
YearCompletely ImmunizedReligious ExemptionMedical ExemptionConditionalPolioHepatitis BVaricellaDTPMMR
201283.0%0.0%2.0%16.0%89.0%95.0%98.0%89.0%87.0%
201398.0%0.0%2.0%0.0%98.0%98.0%98.0%98.0%98.0%
2014100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
2015100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
2016100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
2017≥98.0%≤2.0%≤2.0%≤2.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%
2018≥98.0%≤2.0%≤2.0%≤2.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%
2019≥98.0%≤2.0%≤2.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%

Data source: California Department of Public Health
Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for E. L. Musick Elementary

Help

YearTotal Expenditures Per Pupil
2018 $13,668

Data source: California Department of Education
Pre and Post Pandemic Data

Impact of COVID-19 on E. L. Musick Elementary

The coronavirus has had a profound impact on education in America. Learning shifted online overnight, attendance numbers dwindled, and enrollment decreased. SchoolDigger.com is making it easier for you to better assess how COVID-19 has impacted your school. Through the collection of pre-pandemic (2019) and current data, SchoolDigger.com is sharing test scores, enrollment numbers and school demographics from schools across the country – and we make it easy to see how impacted schools compare locally and statewide.

Rankings

Rank
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Rank
Pandemic (2021-2022)
Change (%)
Ranks 3370th of 5789 Elementary schoolsRanks 2132nd of 5883 Elementary schools
 22%

Test Scores

% proficient
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
% proficient
Pandemic (2021-2022)
Change (%)
3rd Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (E. L. Musick Elementary)21.647.8
 26.2%
   3rd Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Newark Unified)45.454.7
 9.3%
   3rd Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (California)48.542.2
 6.4%
3rd Grade Mathematics (E. L. Musick Elementary)37.847.8
 10%
   3rd Grade Mathematics (Newark Unified)48.957.6
 8.7%
   3rd Grade Mathematics (California)50.243.5
 6.7%
4th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (E. L. Musick Elementary)38.735.7
 3%
   4th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Newark Unified)47.344
 3.3%
   4th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (California)49.544.2
 5.3%
4th Grade Mathematics (E. L. Musick Elementary)41.942.9
 0.9%
   4th Grade Mathematics (Newark Unified)47.243.2
 3.9%
   4th Grade Mathematics (California)44.938.3
 6.7%
5th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (E. L. Musick Elementary)54.248.4
 5.8%
   5th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Newark Unified)52.248.5
 3.7%
   5th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (California)51.747.1
 4.6%
5th Grade Mathematics (E. L. Musick Elementary)45.829
 16.8%
   5th Grade Mathematics (Newark Unified)39.237.4
 1.9%
   5th Grade Mathematics (California)3831.6
 6.4%
5th Grade Science (E. L. Musick Elementary)20.822.6
 1.8%
   5th Grade Science (Newark Unified)31.432.8
 1.4%
   5th Grade Science (California)31.731.2
 0.5%
6th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (E. L. Musick Elementary)46.473.1
 26.7%
   6th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Newark Unified)47.146.2
 0.9%
   6th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (California)48.545.1
 3.3%
6th Grade Mathematics (E. L. Musick Elementary)27.650
 22.4%
   6th Grade Mathematics (Newark Unified)41.334.2
 7.2%
   6th Grade Mathematics (California)38.532.5
 6%


Schools Near E. L. Musick Elementary









Frequently Asked Questions about E. L. Musick Elementary

In the 2021-22 school year, 176 students attended E. L. Musick Elementary.

Students at E. L. Musick Elementary are 56% Hispanic, 27% Asian, 10% Two or more races, 5% White, 1% African American, 1% Pacific Islander.


Rate E. L. Musick Elementary!



Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for E. L. Musick Elementary!




SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the California Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.





Diagnostics

None retrieved from Database in 59 milliseconds.