Rank History for Environment Community Opportunity (ECO) Charter School
Compare
Rank History for all elementary school students at Environment Community Opportunity (ECO) Charter School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Elementary Schools |
NJ State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2007 |
16.75 |
1168th |
1329 |
12.1% |
|
2008 |
49.51 |
847th |
1338 |
36.7% |
|
2009 |
30.73 |
1056th |
1346 |
21.5% |
|
2010 |
42.04 |
932nd |
1354 |
31.2% |
|
2011 |
53.78 |
786th |
1360 |
42.2% |
|
2012 |
32.15 |
1037th |
1363 |
23.9% |
|
2013 |
26.20 |
1086th |
1367 |
20.6% |
|
2014 |
22.62 |
1120th |
1363 |
17.8% |
|
2015 |
50.23 |
720th |
1357 |
46.9% |
|
2016 |
52.68 |
673rd |
1346 |
50.0% |
|
2017 |
60.92 |
581st |
1352 |
57.0% |
|
2018 |
59.54 |
585th |
1353 |
56.8% |
|
2019 |
40.05 |
861st |
1360 |
36.7% |
|
2021 |
28.32 |
891st |
1317 |
32.3% |
|
2022 |
23.24 |
1030th |
1345 |
23.4% |
|
See the entire list of
New Jersey School Rankings!
Rank History for elementary school Low Socio Economic Status students at Environment Community Opportunity (ECO) Charter School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Elementary Schools |
NJ State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2018 |
84.12 |
87th |
942 |
90.8% |
|
See the entire list of
Best New Jersey Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!
Rank History for elementary school Female students at Environment Community Opportunity (ECO) Charter School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Elementary Schools |
NJ State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2018 |
73.67 |
369th |
1333 |
72.3% |
|
2019 |
34.15 |
918th |
1331 |
31.0% |
|
2021 |
25.89 |
927th |
1290 |
28.1% |
|
See the entire list of
Best New Jersey Schools for Female Students!
Rank History for elementary school Male students at Environment Community Opportunity (ECO) Charter School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Elementary Schools |
NJ State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2018 |
40.19 |
827th |
1334 |
38.0% |
|
2019 |
17.91 |
1109th |
1335 |
16.9% |
|
2021 |
25.59 |
904th |
1297 |
30.3% |
|
See the entire list of
Best New Jersey Schools for Male Students!
Rank History for elementary school African American students at Environment Community Opportunity (ECO) Charter School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Elementary Schools |
NJ State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2018 |
89.71 |
35th |
517 |
93.2% |
|
2019 |
67.97 |
136th |
522 |
73.9% |
|
2021 |
64.28 |
104th |
456 |
77.2% |
|
2022 |
56.93 |
185th |
494 |
62.6% |
|
See the entire list of
Best New Jersey Schools for African American Students!
Rank History for elementary school Hispanic students at Environment Community Opportunity (ECO) Charter School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Elementary Schools |
NJ State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2019 |
51.14 |
403rd |
899 |
55.2% |
|
2021 |
21.81 |
782nd |
896 |
12.7% |
|
See the entire list of
Best New Jersey Schools for Hispanic Students!
Data source: test scores: New Jersey Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com
Rank History for Environment Community Opportunity (ECO) Charter School
Compare
Rank History for all middle school students at Environment Community Opportunity (ECO) Charter School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
NJ State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2021 |
37.67 |
367th |
652 |
43.7% |
|
2022 |
48.88 |
351st |
745 |
52.9% |
|
See the entire list of
New Jersey School Rankings!
Rank History for middle school African American students at Environment Community Opportunity (ECO) Charter School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
NJ State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2021 |
81.65 |
25th |
291 |
91.4% |
|
2022 |
82.17 |
29th |
356 |
91.9% |
|
See the entire list of
Best New Jersey Schools for African American Students!
Data source: test scores: New Jersey Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com
As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.
Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.