Summary
Heard Street is a K–6 elementary school in Worcester, MA, serving 245 students as part of Worcester Public Schools, a district ranked 304th of 351 in Massachusetts, while the school itself ranked 553rd of 899 (38th percentile, 2 stars) in 2025–2026. It performs better than its district and most nearby Worcester elementary schools, though it remains below the state median overall.
In 2025–2026 MCAS results, Heard Street’s all-grades proficiency was 37.32% in English language arts, 28.17% in math, and 46.15% in science. It outperformed the Worcester district in all three subjects: ELA by 12.34 points, math by 3.92 points, and science by 22.18 points. Compared with Massachusetts, ELA was slightly below, math was well below, and science was above. Among nearby Worcester same-district schools, Heard Street had the highest overall rank, ahead of May Street, Columbus Park, Canterbury, Gates Lane, Quinsigamond, and Woodland Academy. But Swanson Road Intermediate School in Auburn outperformed it in all three subjects, though it serves a different district and only grades 3–5. Locally, May Street has lower overall rank but much stronger math, including a large advantage in 6th grade. Heard Street’s own strengths were 3rd-grade ELA and 5th-grade science, both above state averages, while 6th-grade math (15.38%) and 6th-grade ELA were weak spots below district and state.
Recent trends are mixed. Heard Street’s overall percentile fell from 56th in 2021–2022 to 38th in 2025–2026, and ELA and math declined from 2023–2024 peaks, while science spiked in 2025–2026—a result to interpret cautiously because science is tested only in 5th grade. Effectiveness for low-socioeconomic-status students was 55th percentile, above its overall 38th percentile, though down from 78th in 2023–2024; older special education data was strong but not current. Heard Street has the smallest enrollment among nearby Worcester schools listed, and its student-teacher ratio improved to 13.8 in 2024–2025. Per-student spending was $15,776 in 2020–2021, lower than most Worcester peers, yet results are higher, suggesting efficient resource use, though the data is old. Free/reduced-lunch percentages were unavailable, and grade spans differ among nearby schools, so comparisons have limits.
Thank you for your feedback!