Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Hallsville Pri
Compare
| Year |
# Students |
Full-time Teachers |
Student/Teacher ratio |
% Free/Discounted Lunch |
| 1989 |
725 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
| 1990 |
739 |
43.0 |
17.1 |
n/a |
| 1991 |
468 |
43.5 |
10.7 |
n/a |
| 1992 |
513 |
30.8 |
16.6 |
17.3 |
| 1993 |
535 |
32.0 |
16.7 |
27.7 |
| 1994 |
550 |
34.0 |
16.2 |
28.2 |
| 1995 |
605 |
38.1 |
15.9 |
29.4 |
| 1996 |
605 |
38.1 |
15.9 |
29.4 |
| 1997 |
644 |
39.4 |
16.3 |
28.6 |
| 1998 |
344 |
21.9 |
15.7 |
35.2 |
| 1999 |
346 |
20.3 |
17.0 |
46.8 |
| 2000 |
322 |
20.1 |
16.0 |
42.9 |
| 2001 |
304 |
21.1 |
14.4 |
50.7 |
| 2002 |
350 |
22.3 |
15.7 |
48.9 |
| 2003 |
350 |
22.3 |
15.7 |
48.9 |
| 2004 |
329 |
19.1 |
17.2 |
59.3 |
| 2005 |
339 |
19.1 |
17.7 |
54.9 |
| 2006 |
356 |
19.4 |
18.4 |
60.7 |
| 2007 |
372 |
22.4 |
16.6 |
55.1 |
| 2008 |
366 |
29.3 |
12.5 |
56.8 |
| 2009 |
405 |
26.4 |
15.3 |
54.6 |
| 2010 |
467 |
25.4 |
18.3 |
59.5 |
| 2011 |
450 |
25.0 |
18.0 |
61.6 |
| 2012 |
132 |
5.5 |
24.0 |
96.2 |
| 2013 |
116 |
4.5 |
25.7 |
94.8 |
| 2014 |
103 |
4.5 |
22.8 |
97.1 |
| 2015 |
116 |
4.0 |
29.0 |
97.4 |
| 2016 |
118 |
4.0 |
29.5 |
97.5 |
| 2017 |
122 |
6.0 |
20.0 |
97.5 |
| 2018 |
134 |
6.0 |
22.3 |
91.8 |
| 2019 |
134 |
7.0 |
19.1 |
94.8 |
| 2020 |
116 |
7.1 |
16.2 |
99.1 |
| 2021 |
116 |
7.1 |
16.2 |
93.1 |
| 2022 |
107 |
7.1 |
14.8 |
96.3 |
Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.
About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:
The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.
