Rank History for 518 Virtual Instruction Secondary
Compare
| Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Elementary Schools |
MN State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
|---|
| 2016 |
21.21 |
717th |
848 |
15.4% |
|
| 2017 |
33.12 |
650th |
853 |
23.8% |
|
| 2018 |
31.77 |
652nd |
847 |
23.0% |
|
| 2019 |
45.00 |
568th |
870 |
34.7% |
|
See the entire list of
Minnesota School Rankings!
Data source: test scores: Minnesota Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com
Rank History for 518 Virtual Instruction Secondary
Compare
Rank History for all middle school students at 518 Virtual Instruction Secondary
| Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
MN State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
|---|
| 2018 |
48.43 |
301st |
518 |
41.9% |
|
| 2019 |
46.18 |
314th |
533 |
41.1% |
|
See the entire list of
Minnesota School Rankings!
Rank History for middle school Female students at 518 Virtual Instruction Secondary
| Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
MN State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
|---|
| 2019 |
48.96 |
244th |
439 |
44.4% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Minnesota Schools for Female Students!
Rank History for middle school Male students at 518 Virtual Instruction Secondary
| Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
MN State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
|---|
| 2018 |
41.06 |
297th |
438 |
32.2% |
|
| 2019 |
37.88 |
302nd |
454 |
33.5% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Minnesota Schools for Male Students!
Rank History for middle school White students at 518 Virtual Instruction Secondary
| Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
MN State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
|---|
| 2018 |
22.73 |
362nd |
428 |
15.4% |
|
| 2019 |
30.66 |
335th |
428 |
21.7% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Minnesota Schools for White Students!
Data source: test scores: Minnesota Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com
As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.
Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.
