Spring Lake Charter

Public, Charter K-8

 4675 Mayette Ave.
       Santa Rosa, CA  95405-7331


(707) 545-1771

District: Rincon Valley Union Elementary

Per Pupil Expenditures:  $11,085 Help


Students who attend Spring Lake Charter usually attend:

Middle:    Rincon Valley Middle
High:    Maria Carrillo High

Student/teacher ratio:  15.4 Help
Number of students:  328

Racial breakdown:

White:
57.3%
Hispanic:
24.7%
Two or more races:
7.3%
more

Free/discounted lunch recipients:  28.4% Help


 See top rated California public schools

 Compare Spring Lake Charter to nearby elementary schools!

Performance Trends
Help
Compare Details Spring Lake Charter is not ranked due for the most recent year due to insufficient test score data. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2022 the calculated Average Standard Score was 57.32. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details Spring Lake Charter ranks better than 79.7% of middle schools in California. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2023 the calculated Average Standard Score was 75.64. (See more...)
Help
Chronic absenteeism in a high school refers to a situation where students repeatedly miss school, with the threshold often defined as missing 10% or more of school days for any reason, excused or unexcused.
Student Body
Help
Compare Details Racial makeup is: White (57.3%), Hispanic (24.7%), two or more races (7.3%). (See more...)
Help
Compare Details 28.4% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. (See more...)
Teachers
Help
Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at Spring Lake Charter is 15.4, which is the 2nd best among 7 elementary schools in the Rincon Valley Union Elementary School District. (See more...)
Help
Compare Spring Lake Charter employs 21.2 full-time teachers.
Finance
Help
Compare Details The average total spent per student at Spring Lake Charter is $11,085. 4 elementary schools in the Rincon Valley Union Elementary School District spend more per student.
Schooldigger 2022 Rankings:

Spring Lake Charter:

SchoolDigger ranks Spring Lake Charter 567th of 2798 California public middle schools. (See Spring Lake Charter in the ranking list.)

Middle School Test Score Ratings by Student Subgroup:


Low Socio Economic Status students:
Female students:
Disabled students:
Male students:
Hispanic students:
White students:


Rincon Valley Union Elementary:

SchoolDigger ranks Rincon Valley Union Elementary 456th of 1560 California school districts. (See district ranking list.)

Average Parent Rating:

Read all reviews and ratings detail for Spring Lake Charter.

What do you think?

Your rating for Spring Lake Charter?

Rank History for Spring Lake Charter

Help
Compare
Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2022 57.32 2159th 5883 63.3%
See the entire list of California Elementary School Rankings!

Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

Rank History for Spring Lake Charter

Help
Compare

Rank History for all middle school students at Spring Lake Charter

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2007 68.02 527th 1999 73.6%
2008 78.34 319th 2005 84.1%
2009 70.43 501st 2063 75.7%
2010 84.30 209th 2179 90.4%
2011 82.35 248th 2236 88.9%
2012 71.25 541st 2259 76.1%
2013 67.87 659th 2379 72.3%
2015 76.75 500th 2477 79.8%
2016 64.29 772nd 2497 69.1%
2017 81.80 417th 2508 83.4%
2018 79.41 460th 2480 81.5%
2019 70.67 678th 2715 75.0%
2022 78.87 506th 2740 81.5%
2023 75.64 567th 2788 79.7%
See the entire list of California Elementary School Rankings!

Rank History for middle school Multi-racial students at Spring Lake Charter

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2023 41.72 404th 678 40.4%
See the entire list of Best California Elementary Schools for Multi-racial Students!

Rank History for middle school Special Education students at Spring Lake Charter

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2023 76.29 201st 1532 86.9%
See the entire list of Best California Elementary Schools for Special Education Students!

Rank History for middle school Low Socio Economic Status students at Spring Lake Charter

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 74.59 389th 2230 82.6%
2019 58.74 766th 2369 67.7%
2022 73.45 437th 2458 82.2%
2023 62.11 701st 2535 72.3%
See the entire list of Best California Elementary Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!

Rank History for middle school Female students at Spring Lake Charter

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 71.78 567th 2262 74.9%
2019 60.97 809th 2380 66.0%
2022 74.79 531st 2509 78.8%
2023 70.50 605th 2535 76.1%
See the entire list of Best California Elementary Schools for Female Students!

Rank History for middle school Disabled students at Spring Lake Charter

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 83.88 134th 1369 90.2%
2019 93.28 66th 1491 95.6%
2022 89.58 102nd 1531 93.3%
See the entire list of Best California Elementary Schools for Disabled Students!

Rank History for middle school Male students at Spring Lake Charter

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 83.60 345th 2273 84.8%
2019 76.62 495th 2407 79.4%
2022 80.74 429th 2527 83.0%
2023 78.01 475th 2546 81.3%
See the entire list of Best California Elementary Schools for Male Students!

Rank History for middle school Hispanic students at Spring Lake Charter

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 51.12 881st 2072 57.5%
2019 45.35 1083rd 2213 51.1%
2022 78.82 314th 2359 86.7%
2023 67.44 575th 2379 75.8%
See the entire list of Best California Elementary Schools for Hispanic Students!

Rank History for middle school White students at Spring Lake Charter

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 74.15 370th 1496 75.3%
2019 63.48 577th 1602 64.0%
2022 63.41 528th 1555 66.0%
2023 63.09 532nd 1549 65.7%
See the entire list of Best California Elementary Schools for White Students!

Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.

Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.

Spring Lake Charter Test Scores
Tests: 
  
Grades: 
  
Years: 
  
Group by: 
District Scores:
State Scores:    
  
Subgroup: 






Data source: California Department of Education

Review counts

All ratings (Avg rating: 1)
0%

0%

0%

0%

100%

  

by a parent
Saturday, September 25, 2010

Open Quote RVCS was considered, "The", school to be in.
The children were giddy at the thought of having their own laptops, and the parents were excited, (and competitive), to have their children accepted.
Myself, and wife, were two of those people.
That is a very embarrassing admission in retrospect.
I will attempt to explain why that is, hopefully, in this posting.
This school has put itself on a pedestal, poorly imitating elite schools of larger cities, and exploiting the concern of loving parents.
There is the facade of a rigorous selection process, when in fact, most children that apply are accepted.
There is also an obvious, palpable, desire by the staff, to be viewed as though they are somehow superior to the teachers in the surrounding schools.
Unfortunately, this school is beyond a let down, and all smoke and mirrors.
The main appeal to the parents is obvious.
The thought of the small class sizes, intimate teacher to student ratios, take home laptops, with nurturing, creative staff, are just a few of the teasers the school exudes, but does not come close to providing.
The reality is that it deserves a reputation, but not the positive kind.
Class sizes are small, and initially that is a wonderful change! Until your children begin to realize that there is a difference between cozy small, and claustrophobic small.
The school does nothing to prepare students for the bustling schools that await them just around the proverbial corner.
They are not exposed to lockers, (using "cubbyholes" as they did in kindergarten.), they are enclosed in approximately three small single wades, and share the same teachers for almost every class, I., your child might have the same teacher for almost every class, everyday. (forget about a specialized teaching pool here, your child will most likely learn math from his PE teacher, who also will be the same teacher that they have for English, etc.)
Teachers are often under educated, in any subject but the one they were specifically geared for.
The much touted laptops are a disgrace.
Most are so severely abused, by the time your child receives them, they either cannot hold a charge, have broken screens, are scratched, cracked, marked, missing keys, and have software that routinely self deletes assignments.
This is also accompanied by a, $1,000.00 dollar, "insurance fee" to be put up by the parents.
This is not mandated of course, but heavily pushed under the threat of the parent having to pay the same amount in replacement fee's, should a complaint be made about the condition of the device.
The children could find four new laptops for this price that exceed what is provided.
Now as for the supposed role of the nurturing, more concerned staff, and intimate nature of the school.
The staff, with few exceptions, are less caring then any school in the area.
SR, is rich in wonderful teachers, and school administrators. True professionals, that prove through their actions, that they are in this profession for a love of teaching, family, children, and community.
RVCS seems to seek these people out, and NOT employ them.
They attract, more likely than not, people who want to work in an overly controlled, overly strict, less challenging environment, with accountability being virtually non existent.
Most of this can be observed as a trickle down effect from the abrasive VP, who is not only openly rude to parents, and students, but obviously an overbearing entity to the entire environment.
Her presence is so hostile as to be noticeable in the demeanor, body language, and tone, of the staff around her.
The comfort of staff, parents, and children, in her presence, as opposed to her absence, is undeniable.
I will leave my review at this.
I hope that something here will confirm what others have felt/thought as well, but were afraid to comment on.
This schools culture is one that is commented on by many parents privately. To state any open, constructive, criticism will not be well received, and if it is, be ready for the consequences.
Forget about professionalism, with regards to you as a entity, V's your children as students.
Your child's privacy is not high on the staffs list, and it is common to overhear conversations.
I was within earshot, as were students, on numerous occasions, when staff aired their feelings about everything from parents financial status, ethnicity, medical conditions, marital/dating status, clothing choices, grades, and the list goes on.
In closing, I would like to thank every other teacher I have had the pleasure of meeting in the SR area school district.
They truly exude the best examples of what true educators are, and should strive to be.
Thankfully, RVSD has managed to quarantine all of the less competent, under qualified, and motivationally challenged staff, into one location. Close Quote



Enrollment information for Spring Lake Charter

Help
Compare
Year White African American Asian Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Not Specified Total
2005 67 3 1 4 1 n/a n/a 0 76
2006 110 9 3 17 3 n/a n/a 0 142
2007 110 9 8 27 1 n/a n/a 4 159
2008 119 10 12 22 4 n/a n/a 0 167
2009 122 9 12 18 4 1 0 0 166
2010 114 7 11 25 2 1 3 0 163
2011 106 8 8 36 1 2 6 0 167
2012 106 7 8 40 0 2 6 0 169
2013 113 7 9 31 1 1 5 0 167
2014 160 9 12 55 6 1 11 0 254
2015 187 7 16 79 6 0 11 0 306
2016 177 6 9 81 4 1 15 0 293
2017 223 12 15 93 7 2 16 0 368
2018 208 11 16 69 8 4 11 0 327
2019 217 6 17 89 6 6 20 0 361
2020 211 5 13 99 5 3 19 0 355
2021 275 12 21 97 6 5 34 0 450
2022 212 8 18 97 11 4 35 0 385
2023 188 7 13 81 10 3 24 2 328

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Spring Lake Charter

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
2005 76 3.0 25.3 17.1
2006 142 6.4 22.2 0
2007 159 7.4 21.5 13.5
2008 167 8.0 20.9 16.2
2009 166 8.2 18.4 24.1
2010 163 10.0 16.3 21.5
2011 167 n/a n/a 22.8
2012 169 7.9 21.3 n/a
2013 167 7.4 22.4 29.9
2014 254 11.5 22.0 29.1
2015 306 15.0 20.4 31
2016 293 13.0 22.5 29.7
2017 368 16.1 22.7 24.7
2018 327 16.7 19.5 35.8
2019 361 17.8 20.2 24.1
2020 355 n/a n/a 23.1
2021 450 23.3 19.2 26.7
2022 385 24.7 15.5 34.8
2023 328 21.2 15.4 28.4

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio Spring Lake Charter

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
2005 76 3.0 25.3 17.1
2006 142 6.4 22.2 0
2007 159 7.4 21.5 13.5
2008 167 8.0 20.9 16.2
2009 166 8.2 18.4 24.1
2010 163 10.0 16.3 21.5
2011 167 n/a n/a 22.8
2012 169 7.9 21.3 n/a
2013 167 7.4 22.4 29.9
2014 254 11.5 22.0 29.1
2015 306 15.0 20.4 31
2016 293 13.0 22.5 29.7
2017 368 16.1 22.7 24.7
2018 327 16.7 19.5 35.8
2019 361 17.8 20.2 24.1
2020 355 n/a n/a 23.1
2021 450 23.3 19.2 26.7
2022 385 24.7 15.5 34.8
2023 328 21.2 15.4 28.4

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.
Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for Spring Lake Charter

Help

YearTotal Expenditures Per Pupil
2018 $11,085

Data source: California Department of Education
Pre and Post Pandemic Data

Impact of COVID-19 on Spring Lake Charter

The coronavirus has had a profound impact on education in America. Learning shifted online overnight, attendance numbers dwindled, and enrollment decreased. SchoolDigger.com is making it easier for you to better assess how COVID-19 has impacted your school. Through the collection of pre-pandemic (2019) and current data, SchoolDigger.com is sharing test scores, enrollment numbers and school demographics from schools across the country – and we make it easy to see how impacted schools compare locally and statewide.

Rankings

Rank
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Rank
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Ranks 678th of 2715 Middle schoolsRanks 567th of 2788 Middle schools
 4.6%

Test Scores

% proficient
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
% proficient
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
7th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Spring Lake Charter)66.261.6
 4.6%
   7th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Rincon Valley Union Elementary)66.261.6
 4.6%
   7th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (California)51.447.4
 3.9%
7th Grade Mathematics (Spring Lake Charter)37.442.4
 5%
   7th Grade Mathematics (Rincon Valley Union Elementary)37.442.4
 5%
   7th Grade Mathematics (California)37.933.2
 4.7%
8th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Spring Lake Charter)67.260.9
 6.3%
   8th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Rincon Valley Union Elementary)67.260.9
 6.3%
   8th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (California)49.445.7
 3.8%
8th Grade Mathematics (Spring Lake Charter)36.433.3
 3.1%
   8th Grade Mathematics (Rincon Valley Union Elementary)36.433.3
 3.1%
   8th Grade Mathematics (California)36.629.9
 6.7%
8th Grade Science (Spring Lake Charter)49.245.5
 3.7%
   8th Grade Science (Rincon Valley Union Elementary)49.245.5
 3.7%
   8th Grade Science (California)30.828.8
 2.1%

Student Body

Number of students
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Number of students
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Total Students361328
 9.1%
African American67
 16.7%
American Indian610
 66.7%
Asian1713
 23.5%
Hispanic8981
 9%
Pacific Islander63
 50%
White217188
 13.4%
Two or More Races2024
 20%
% Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients24.1%28.4%
 4.3%


Schools Near Spring Lake Charter









Frequently Asked Questions about Spring Lake Charter

Students at Spring Lake Charter are 57% White, 25% Hispanic, 7% Two or more races, 4% Asian, 3% American Indian, 2% African American.

In the 2022-23 school year, 328 students attended Spring Lake Charter.

Students who attend Spring Lake Charter usually go on to attend:

Middle : Rincon Valley Middle
High : Maria Carrillo High


Rate Spring Lake Charter!



Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Spring Lake Charter!




SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the California Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.





Diagnostics

None retrieved from Database in 84 milliseconds.