1. Home
  2. California
  3. Oakland
  4. Oakland Unified
  5. Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art

Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art

NOTE: this school is no longer listed as a functioning school by the National Center for Education Statistics. We continue to list this school on SchoolDigger for historical purposes.

It is possible that this school is still operating under a different district or under a different name. If you believe this to be the case, please search for this school by using the search box above.

Public, Charter K-8

 8425 MacArthur Blvd.
       Oakland, CA  94605-3553

(510) 729-6635

District: Oakland Unified


Student/teacher ratio:  17.1 Help
Number of students:  223

Racial breakdown:

African American:
65.9%
Two or more races:
22.0%
Hispanic:
11.7%
more

Free/discounted lunch recipients:  98.2% Help


 See top rated California public schools


Performance Trends
Help
Compare Details Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art is not ranked due for the most recent year due to insufficient test score data. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2013 the calculated Average Standard Score was 17.32. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art is not ranked due for the most recent year due to insufficient test score data. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2013 the calculated Average Standard Score was 14.22. (See more...)
Student Body
Teachers
Schooldigger Rankings:

Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art was not ranked this year due to insufficient test score data.

Oakland Unified:

SchoolDigger ranks Oakland Unified 1152nd of 1560 California school districts. (See district ranking list.)


What do you think?

Your rating for Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art?

Rank History for Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art

Help
Compare
Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2004 21.99 3786th 4809 21.3%
2005 39.19 2770th 4822 42.6%
2006 28.78 3394th 4818 29.6%
2007 42.21 2773rd 5113 45.8%
2008 16.07 4586th 5113 10.3%
2009 12.16 4900th 5193 5.6%
2010 14.13 4954th 5314 6.8%
2011 9.58 5232nd 5377 2.7%
2012 8.63 5240th 5390 2.8%
2013 17.32 4903rd 5530 11.3%
See the entire list of California School Rankings!

Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

Rank History for Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art

Help
Compare
Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2004 18.35 1486th 1769 16.0%
2005 22.98 1370th 1777 22.9%
2006 25.43 1357th 1804 24.8%
2007 29.25 1410th 1999 29.5%
2008 24.76 1573rd 2005 21.5%
2009 25.77 1582nd 2063 23.3%
2010 19.87 1853rd 2179 15.0%
2011 23.39 1817th 2236 18.7%
2012 11.51 2095th 2259 7.3%
2013 14.22 2148th 2379 9.7%
See the entire list of California School Rankings!

Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art Test Scores
Tests: 
  
Grades: 
  
Years: 
  
Group by: 
District Scores:
State Scores:    




Data source: California Department of Education

We're sorry, but no reviews have been submitted for Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art.

If you have first-hand knowledge about Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art, submit a rating!


Reviews:
No reviews have been submitted!

Enrollment information for Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art

Help
Compare
Year White African American Asian Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Not Specified Total
2000 0 230 0 39 0 n/a n/a 0 269
2001 7 5 0 3 0 n/a n/a 0 15
2002 0 259 0 71 0 n/a n/a 6 336
2003 0 259 0 71 0 n/a n/a 6 336
2004 0 274 0 73 0 n/a n/a 0 347
2005 0 256 0 78 0 n/a n/a 15 349
2006 0 277 0 77 0 n/a n/a 17 371
2007 0 277 3 62 0 n/a n/a 2 344
2008 n/a 289 1 60 n/a n/a n/a 0 350
2009 0 307 0 64 0 2 3 0 376
2010 0 273 2 55 0 0 4 0 334
2011 0 173 2 38 0 0 3 0 216
2012 3 198 0 47 0 1 110 0 359
2013 1 200 0 48 0 0 68 0 317
2014 0 147 0 26 0 1 49 0 223

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
2000 269 13.0 20.7 78.4
2001 15 15.0 1.0 80
2002 336 23.3 14.4 0
2003 336 23.3 14.4 0
2004 347 14.0 24.8 0
2005 349 22.0 15.9 70.1
2006 371 24.0 15.5 60.7
2007 344 21.0 16.4 67
2008 350 22.2 15.8 45.7
2009 376 21.6 17.3 58.5
2010 334 20.5 16.2 96.4
2011 216 n/a n/a 98.6
2012 359 20.0 17.9 n/a
2013 317 18.0 17.6 79.5
2014 223 13.0 17.1 98.2

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
2000 269 13.0 20.7 78.4
2001 15 15.0 1.0 80
2002 336 23.3 14.4 0
2003 336 23.3 14.4 0
2004 347 14.0 24.8 0
2005 349 22.0 15.9 70.1
2006 371 24.0 15.5 60.7
2007 344 21.0 16.4 67
2008 350 22.2 15.8 45.7
2009 376 21.6 17.3 58.5
2010 334 20.5 16.2 96.4
2011 216 n/a n/a 98.6
2012 359 20.0 17.9 n/a
2013 317 18.0 17.6 79.5
2014 223 13.0 17.1 98.2

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.




Frequently Asked Questions about Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art

In the 2013-14 school year, 223 students attended Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art.

Students at Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art are 66% African American, 22% Two or more races, 12% Hispanic.


Rate Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art!



Other helpful SchoolDigger resources...


Compare to nearby schools

CACalifornia School Rankings

CACalifornia District Rankings

Schools in Oakland, CA

Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art!




SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the California Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.




Diagnostics

None retrieved from Database in 17 milliseconds.