Is Campo High (Continuation) a good school?

Campo High (Continuation) ranks in the bottom 6.4% of California high schools.

How many students attend Campo High (Continuation)?

In the 2022-23 school year, 13 students attended Campo High (Continuation).

What is the racial makeup of Campo High (Continuation)?

Students at Campo High (Continuation) are 69% Hispanic, 31% White.

Campo High (Continuation) School in Pine Valley CA

Performance Trends

Compare Details Campo High (Continuation) ranks worse than 93.6% of high schools in California. It also ranks last among 3 ranked high schools in the Mountain Empire Unified School District. (See more...)

Compare Details In 2023 the calculated Average Standard Score was 7.99. (See more...)

The Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate (ACGR) measures the percentage of Campo High (Continuation) freshmen who graduate within four years, adjusting for students who transfer in or out.

The high school dropout rate measures the percentage of students who do not complete their high school education.

Chronic absenteeism in a high school refers to a situation where students repeatedly miss school, with the threshold often defined as missing 10% or more of school days for any reason, excused or unexcused.

Student Body

Compare Details Racial makeup is: Hispanic (69.2%), White (30.8%). (See more...)

Compare Details 76.9% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. This is the highest percentage in the Mountain Empire Unified School District. (See more...)

Teachers

Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at Campo High (Continuation) is 10.1, which is the lowest among 4 high schools in the Mountain Empire Unified School District! (See more...)

Compare Campo High (Continuation) employs 1.2 full-time teachers.

Finance

Compare Details The average total spent per student at Campo High (Continuation) is $10,227, which is the lowest among 4 high schools in the Mountain Empire Unified School District!

Schooldigger Rankings:

Campo High (Continuation) was not ranked this year due to insufficient test score data.

SchoolDigger ranks Campo High (Continuation) 2196^th of 2346 California public high schools. (See Campo High (Continuation) in the ranking list.)

Mountain Empire Unified:

SchoolDigger ranks Mountain Empire Unified 1296^th of 1560 California school districts. (See district ranking list.)

What do you think?

Your rating for Campo High (Continuation)?

(Ranking FAQ)

Rank History for Campo High (Continuation)

Compare

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked High Schools	CA State Percentile
2006	4.55	1820^th	1968	7.5%
2007	4.83	1913^th	2063	7.3%
2008	4.77	1953^rd	2117	7.7%
2009	4.86	2209^th	2238	1.3%
2010	10.77	1987^th	2281	12.9%
2011	7.59	2104^th	2367	11.1%
2012	5.11	2137^th	2354	9.2%
2013	4.99	2203^rd	2426	9.2%
2023	7.99	2185^th	2335	6.4%

See the entire list of California High School Rankings!

Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

Data source: California Department of Education

We're sorry, but no reviews have been submitted for Campo High (Continuation).

If you have first-hand knowledge about Campo High (Continuation), submit a rating!

Reviews:
No reviews have been submitted!

Enrollment information for Campo High (Continuation)

Compare

Year	White	African American	Asian	Hispanic	American Indian	Pacific Islander	Two or More Races	Total
1994	14	0	1	20	5	n/a	n/a	40
1995	62	1	1	22	14	n/a	n/a	100
1996	62	1	1	22	14	n/a	n/a	100
1997	11	0	0	7	1	n/a	n/a	19
1998	11	0	0	6	0	n/a	n/a	17
1999	9	1	0	12	0	n/a	n/a	22
2000	14	0	0	6	8	n/a	n/a	28
2001	12	1	0	11	14	n/a	n/a	38
2002	0	1	0	1	5	n/a	n/a	7
2003	0	1	0	1	5	n/a	n/a	7
2004	1	1	0	2	2	n/a	n/a	6
2005	0	0	0	0	4	n/a	n/a	4
2006	0	0	0	0	6	n/a	n/a	6
2007	1	0	0	3	5	n/a	n/a	9
2008	n/a	1	n/a	2	n/a	n/a	n/a	3
2009	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	1
2010	6	0	0	5	5	0	2	18
2011	14	0	0	14	7	0	1	36
2012	10	1	0	14	6	0	2	33
2013	9	1	0	12	5	1	0	28
2014	5	1	0	14	3	0	0	23
2015	3	0	0	15	2	0	0	20
2016	4	0	0	13	0	0	0	17
2017	4	0	0	13	0	0	0	17
2018	5	0	0	14	2	0	0	21
2019	7	0	0	16	0	0	1	24
2020	10	0	0	12	0	0	2	24
2021	2	0	0	5	0	0	0	7
2022	3	0	0	12	1	0	0	16
2023	4	0	0	9	0	0	0	13

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Campo High (Continuation)

Compare

Year	# Students	Full-time Teachers	Student/Teacher ratio	% Free/Discounted Lunch
1994	40	2.0	20.0	0
1995	100	4.8	20.8	23
1996	100	4.8	20.8	23
1997	19	3.0	6.3	78.9
1998	17	2.0	8.5	64.7
1999	22	2.0	11.0	86.4
2000	28	2.0	14.0	53.6
2001	38	2.6	14.6	71.1
2002	7	1.0	7.0	42.9
2003	7	1.0	7.0	42.9
2004	6	0.2	30.0	50
2005	4	n/a	n/a	25
2006	6	n/a	n/a	50
2007	9	1.0	9.0	11.1
2008	3	0.6	5.0	0
2009	1	0.0	n/a	0
2010	18	2.0	9.0	72.2
2011	36	n/a	n/a	75
2012	33	2.0	16.5	n/a
2013	28	1.2	22.4	57.1
2014	23	2.0	11.5	82.6
2015	20	2.0	10.0	60
2016	17	2.0	8.5	82.4
2017	17	1.5	11.3	82.4
2018	21	2.0	10.5	71.4
2019	24	2.0	12.0	75
2020	24	n/a	n/a	83.3
2021	7	2.0	3.5	n/a
2022	16	2.4	6.6	81.3
2023	13	1.2	10.1	76.9

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio Campo High (Continuation)

Compare

Year	# Students	Full-time Teachers	Student/Teacher ratio	% Free/Discounted Lunch
1994	40	2.0	20.0	0
1995	100	4.8	20.8	23
1996	100	4.8	20.8	23
1997	19	3.0	6.3	78.9
1998	17	2.0	8.5	64.7
1999	22	2.0	11.0	86.4
2000	28	2.0	14.0	53.6
2001	38	2.6	14.6	71.1
2002	7	1.0	7.0	42.9
2003	7	1.0	7.0	42.9
2004	6	0.2	30.0	50
2005	4	n/a	n/a	25
2006	6	n/a	n/a	50
2007	9	1.0	9.0	11.1
2008	3	0.6	5.0	0
2009	1	0.0	n/a	0
2010	18	2.0	9.0	72.2
2011	36	n/a	n/a	75
2012	33	2.0	16.5	n/a
2013	28	1.2	22.4	57.1
2014	23	2.0	11.5	82.6
2015	20	2.0	10.0	60
2016	17	2.0	8.5	82.4
2017	17	1.5	11.3	82.4
2018	21	2.0	10.5	71.4
2019	24	2.0	12.0	75
2020	24	n/a	n/a	83.3
2021	7	2.0	3.5	n/a
2022	16	2.4	6.6	81.3
2023	13	1.2	10.1	76.9

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.

Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for Campo High (Continuation)

Year	Total Expenditures Per Pupil
2018	$10,227

Data source: California Department of Education

Pre and Post Pandemic Data

Impact of COVID-19 on Campo High (Continuation)

The coronavirus has had a profound impact on education in America. Learning shifted online overnight, attendance numbers dwindled, and enrollment decreased. SchoolDigger.com is making it easier for you to better assess how COVID-19 has impacted your school. Through the collection of pre-pandemic (2019) and current data, SchoolDigger.com is sharing test scores, enrollment numbers and school demographics from schools across the country – and we make it easy to see how impacted schools compare locally and statewide.

Student Body

	Number of students Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)	Number of students Post pandemic (2022-2023)	Change (%)
Total Students	24	13	45.8%
African American	0	0
American Indian	0	0
Asian	0	0
Hispanic	16	9	43.8%
Pacific Islander	0	0
White	7	4	42.9%
Two or More Races	1	0	100%
% Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients	75%	76.9%	1.9%

School													Students/Teachers											Ranking (2023)				Ranking (2022)				CAST Science (2023)		Smarter Balanced Assessments English Language Arts/Literacy (2023)		Smarter Balanced Assessments Mathematics (2023)		Per Pupil Expenditures (2018)
Name	Type	Grades	Address	City	Zip	County	District	Is Charter	Is Magnet	Is Virtual	Is Title I	Phone	Enrollment	Full-time Teachers	Student/ Teacher Ratio	Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	American Indian	Pacific Islander	Two or More Races	Average Standard Score (2023)	Statewide Rank (2023)	State Percentile (2023)	SchoolDigger Rating (2023)	Average Standard Score (2022)	Statewide Rank (2022)	State Percentile (2022)	Rank Change from Previous Year	CAST Science 12th Grade	CAST Science End of Course	Smarter Balanced Assessments English Language Arts/Literacy 11th Grade	Smarter Balanced Assessments English Language Arts/Literacy End of Course	Smarter Balanced Assessments Mathematics 11th Grade	Smarter Balanced Assessments Mathematics End of Course	Total
Campo High (Continuation)	Public	9-12	3305 Buckman Springs Rd.	Pine Valley	91962	San Diego County	Mountain Empire Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(619) 478-2735	13	1	10.1	76.9%	4 (30.8%)	0 (0.0%)	9 (69.2%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	8	2196^th of 2346 public high schools	6.4%					(n/a)			9.1	9.1	0.0	0.0	$10,227
Mountain Empire High	Public	9-12	3305 Buckman Springs Rd.	Pine Valley	91962	San Diego County	Mountain Empire Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(619) 473-8601	433	22	19.8	48.0%	120 (27.7%)	13 (3.0%)	266 (61.4%)	3 (0.7%)	15 (3.5%)	1 (0.2%)	15 (3.5%)	29	1445^th of 2346 public high schools	38.4%		30.4	1422^nd of 2123 public high schools	33.0%	23	13.4	13.4	34.1	34.1	13.2	13.2	$11,673
Hillside Junior/Senior High	Public	7-12	3305 Buckman Springs Rd.	Pine Valley	91962	San Diego County	Mountain Empire Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(619) 478-2735	29	2	19.2	72.4%	7 (24.1%)	0 (0.0%)	19 (65.5%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	3 (10.3%)	10.6	2018^th of 2346 public high schools	14.0%		24.2	1555^th of 2123 public high schools	26.8%	463		0.0	7.7	8.3	7.7	8.3	$10,815
Cottonwood Community Day	Public	7-12	3291 Buckman Springs Rd.	Pine Valley	91962	San Diego County	Mountain Empire Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(619) 473-9022	0				0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()								(n/a)							$18,545

Campo High (Continuation)

Mountain Empire Unified:

What do you think?

Rank History for Campo High (Continuation)

Enrollment information for Campo High (Continuation)

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Campo High (Continuation)

Student/Teacher Ratio Campo High (Continuation)

Per Pupil Expenditures for Campo High (Continuation)

Impact of COVID-19 on Campo High (Continuation)

Student Body

Schools Near Campo High (Continuation)